US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in late January and the US’ climate policies could shift directions, as Trump has in the past leaned toward trade protectionism.
Taiwan has already taken a hit in the wake of the implementation of the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM).
The US’ Republican Party last year also proposed the Foreign Pollution Fee Act (FPFA), which targets carbon emissions by levying a “pollution fee” on imported goods. The act is anticipated to garner more emphasis and adherence.
Taiwan’s industries could end up pincered and squeezed between the CBAM and the FPFA. Firms would have to pay far more in “pollution tariffs” on product exports than before. The government should counter this by making arrangements in advance to assist Taiwanese enterprises in accelerating the roll-out of renewables and energy reduction, reducing the impact on Taiwanese firms by decreasing the volume of their carbon emissions.
Under “profound energy saving” policies, although Taiwan has an opportunity to reach its goal to “double the renewable energy efficiency rate by 2030,” its yearly increase in renewable energy supply is only about 3 terawatt-hours (TWh) or about 10 percent to 15 percent of the entire energy supply. At its current rate, it is hard to say whether the nation would achieve this international renewables efficiency doubling goal in time.
Faced with the massive lack in green energy supply for use by the semiconductor industry and in artificial intelligence (AI), a report by the National Renewable Energy Certification Center and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC), titled 2023 Environmental Sustainability Goals Report, showed that even if TSMC reduced its yearly energy consumption by 1.5 percent, it would still fall well short of its 2030 renewable energy goal by about 25,4TWh.
On a similar note, AI champion Nvidia Corp lists in its overall plans a renewable energy demand of 100TWh as an investment condition. With such a massive lack of renewable energy supply, it would be difficult for the current renewables doubling policy to succeed.
To fill in the supply gap for maintaining key industrial development, Taiwan would be forced to open up the entrepreneurial floodgates to “innovative capability,” allowing large-scale energy consumers in the AI field and semiconductor industry to enter the renewable energy production market. “Innovation capability” is the magic keyword in the title of the Statute for Industrial Innovation (產業創新條例) guidelines.
At present, the overhead costs for enterprises that have transitioned to renewables has reached more than NT$5.5 per kilowatt-hour (kWh), vastly higher than the cost for conventional fossil fuel-generated electricity, which has pulled the reins back on many enterprises’ willingness to invest in renewables.
If the Ministry of Economic Affairs integrates “self-provision of renewable energy production and energy storing facilities” into Article 10-1 of the Statute for Industrial Innovation and invests as much as 30 percent in carbon tax credits for companies that adopt renewable energy infrastructure, it could reduce the costs of building infrastructure and facilities. It could also reduce the overhead costs for green energy for industrial-use and lower electricity pricing to within NT$4.29 per kWh, effectively promoting the transition of high-energy use companies to renewables and resolving the imbalance in electricity supply.
The AI and the semiconductor industries are important keystones in the foundation of Taiwan’s economic development. They would guarantee that renewable energy supply is adequate and lead to industry stability and sound development, which could assist Taiwanese exporters and whole-system economic stability and sound growth.
The ministry should emphasize the importance of “innovative capability” and integrate “self-provision of renewable energy production and energy storing facilities” into Article 10-1 of the Statute for Industrial Innovation, using investment to reduce carbon emissions, encourage enterprises to develop self-sufficient renewable energy provisions, and untether enterprises from needing to be limited by supply in the renewable energies market. It should also encourage enterprises to invest simultaneously in promoting the transition to renewables, giving Taiwan a double win in achieving economic development and proactive carbon emissions reductions.
Chen Yung-jen is climate and energy project manager at Greenpeace East Asia.
Translated by Tim Smith
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS