Control is the mantra with which the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) governs its people, and during his presidency, Xi Jinping (習近平) has restored its central role in society. Unprecedented levels of surveillance and a “neighbor watch thy neighbor” system are some of the methods used to maintain order among the 1.4 billion population. However, a spate of random acts of violence is challenging the “party knows best” narrative.
The CCP is paramount in China and is enmeshed within every organ of government. Its legitimacy after 75 years in power depends on continued economic growth. However, the recent downturn has hit millions of young jobseekers hard and has rippled through the workforce. There is no way of knowing whether economic reasons were behind the most dramatic of several recent tragedies that have shocked the nation, but commentary on Chinese social media has linked the violence to worries over social stability.
On Nov. 11, a 62-year-old man rammed his four-wheel drive into a crowd of pedestrians outside a downtown sports center in the southern city of Zhuhai, killing 35 people and injuring dozens more. It was the country’s deadliest known act of civilian violence during Xi’s reign.
The attacker struck after becoming disgruntled over the division of assets in his divorce settlement, reports said. He was subsequently arrested on suspicion of endangering public safety by dangerous means.
A stabbing attack last weekend that left eight people dead was also apparently the result of a personal grievance: a 21-year-old man’s unhappiness with his school over a graduation matter. Both incidents have shone an unwelcome spotlight on the government’s criminal safety record. Known random acts of violence are uncommon in China, but they are being reported more frequently and with greater detail, from state and social media.
Official outlets took more than a day to report the Zhuhai incident, and did not explain reasons for the delay. Very quickly, though, any hint of what happened was swept away, both on and offline. This level of censorship is par for the course in authoritarian regimes, but it is also a reflection of the deep fear that the party has about any mass expression of emotion that could threaten its grip on power.
“They understand that if people gather and come together, their grief can be a powerful mobilizing force,” Freedom House research director for China, Hong Kong and Taiwan Yaqiu Wang said. “They are extraordinarily afraid of any kind of collective action that could be directed at them.”
In the wake of the car killings, Xi has ordered officials to tighten security networks even further to “protect people’s lives and social stability.”
That argument is often used in clampdowns in the province of Xinjiang, where an estimated 1 million Muslim ethnic Uyghurs have been locked up in detention centers. However, the CCP is not increasing its control only over what it considers troublesome hotspots. There are more CCTV surveillance cameras in Chinese cities than anywhere else in the world. Digital authoritarianism has meant that everything from facial data and DNA, to voice imprints and even iris scans, are being collected and stored in giant databases in the name of improving public safety.
Official statistics do show declining crime levels. (Caveat: This data is being used to further cement control.) Even some independent data points to the perception that China’s law and order standards are among the best in the world. There are obvious political points to be scored. Officials often warn their citizens about mass casualty events and gun fueled violence in the US, holding up their own system of governance as superior at keeping people safe. However, this success has come at a great personal cost: individual freedom.
Authoritarian regimes use inordinate levels of control as a way to justify their hold on power. We keep you safe and in return you give us ownership over every aspect of your lives, the unsaid promise says. That deal in China has worked so long as the CCP continues to provide clear evidence that living standards are improving. When that starts to fray, people feel increasingly disaffected with their leaders and would complain.
Some brave citizens do protest.
The China Dissent Monitor, a database assessing the number of demonstrations every year, has documented more than three dozen types of dissent. These range from physical in-person protests, to those expressed through art, non-cooperation, cyber dissent and contentious petitioning or lawsuits. Many are over economic grievances, such as property and job-related issues. Such independent windows into the party’s opaque world challenge the narrative that citizens are satisfied with their government. China’s citizens are not that different from the rest of us. Sweeping problems away is not a long-term solution.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS