The legislature’s Education and Culture Committee is reviewing a report on thawing a frozen budget for Academia Sinica. During the review session, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Yeh Yuan-chih (葉元之) bemoaned an increase in travel expenses for research trips abroad that seemed to not include trips to China. There was no commensurate rise in travel expenses for trips across the Taiwan Strait, Yeh said, implying that the disparity was a result of the tense cross-strait relationship during the Democratic Progressive Party administration.
Yeh said there ought to be far more research exchanges with China in the field of history so Taiwanese researchers could access more resources to promote the values of the Republic of China (ROC).
Academia Sinica is the nation’s most exalted institution of research. It shoulders a heavy burden through its mission to advance national academics and technological development. It is vital that the institute helps facilitate the advance of understanding of technology and other fields while maintaining research conformity with international peers.
It should not feel any obligation to conduct exchanges with China. That would narrow the scope of Taiwan’s academic acumen and technology prowess, potentially putting those attributes in a high-walled, secluded Chinese garden far from the rest of the world.
In the 75 years that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has ruled China with dictatorships, research in the fields of history and literature there have relied on arbitrary notions from Marxism-Leninism and fallen into hero worship. The research methodology there is arbitrary and its resources lack veracity. As research is conducted in service of the Chinese state, truth is not the goal. The material it produces is first and foremost to prop up the CCP and flatter its officials. At best, research is a tool for solidifying state power.
Yeh’s desire to promote ROC values is undermined by his regard for historical research conducted under the CCP regime. That is about as absurd as conducting a seance to garner medical advice from ghosts.
The CCP eradicated the ROC from within China’s borders and the party denies the “values of the ROC.” How could history researchers in a liberal democracy such as Taiwan ever rely on authoritarian falsehoods in materials twisted by the CCP?
Academia Sinica should tread an international path. The institute cannot tie the nation’s academics and technological research to China — especially regarding historical research, as China lacks the conditions that allow for academic freedom.
Conducting research in countries other than China opens avenues for academics to access deeper truths about history.
When funding Academia Sinica, the voice of Taiwanese should be heard opposing the CCP’s “united front” tactics. Yeh’s hero-worship of the CCP goes too far.
Chen Chi-nung is the principal of Shuili Junior High School.
Translated by Tim Smith
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS