The legislature’s Education and Culture Committee is reviewing a report on thawing a frozen budget for Academia Sinica. During the review session, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Yeh Yuan-chih (葉元之) bemoaned an increase in travel expenses for research trips abroad that seemed to not include trips to China. There was no commensurate rise in travel expenses for trips across the Taiwan Strait, Yeh said, implying that the disparity was a result of the tense cross-strait relationship during the Democratic Progressive Party administration.
Yeh said there ought to be far more research exchanges with China in the field of history so Taiwanese researchers could access more resources to promote the values of the Republic of China (ROC).
Academia Sinica is the nation’s most exalted institution of research. It shoulders a heavy burden through its mission to advance national academics and technological development. It is vital that the institute helps facilitate the advance of understanding of technology and other fields while maintaining research conformity with international peers.
It should not feel any obligation to conduct exchanges with China. That would narrow the scope of Taiwan’s academic acumen and technology prowess, potentially putting those attributes in a high-walled, secluded Chinese garden far from the rest of the world.
In the 75 years that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has ruled China with dictatorships, research in the fields of history and literature there have relied on arbitrary notions from Marxism-Leninism and fallen into hero worship. The research methodology there is arbitrary and its resources lack veracity. As research is conducted in service of the Chinese state, truth is not the goal. The material it produces is first and foremost to prop up the CCP and flatter its officials. At best, research is a tool for solidifying state power.
Yeh’s desire to promote ROC values is undermined by his regard for historical research conducted under the CCP regime. That is about as absurd as conducting a seance to garner medical advice from ghosts.
The CCP eradicated the ROC from within China’s borders and the party denies the “values of the ROC.” How could history researchers in a liberal democracy such as Taiwan ever rely on authoritarian falsehoods in materials twisted by the CCP?
Academia Sinica should tread an international path. The institute cannot tie the nation’s academics and technological research to China — especially regarding historical research, as China lacks the conditions that allow for academic freedom.
Conducting research in countries other than China opens avenues for academics to access deeper truths about history.
When funding Academia Sinica, the voice of Taiwanese should be heard opposing the CCP’s “united front” tactics. Yeh’s hero-worship of the CCP goes too far.
Chen Chi-nung is the principal of Shuili Junior High School.
Translated by Tim Smith
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS