The Ministry of Justice dramatically set back women’s rights when it proposed raising the maximum penalty for women undergoing illegal abortions by more than 26-fold. While it has since withdrawn the proposal, its initiation reveals a bleak reality: For all of Taiwan’s pride in its protection of individual freedoms, it falls woefully short in safeguarding the reproductive rights of women, who account for half of the total population.
At the heart of the paradox lies a solution: A sweeping legislative overhaul that decriminalizes abortion and empowers women to decide what is best for their bodies without requiring anyone else’s consent.
Women’s reproductive freedoms continue to be collateral damage from an archaic legal system criminalizing women for terminating pregnancies. It is surprising that, nearly eight decades after the end of Japanese colonial rule, little has changed when it comes to women’s reproductive autonomy. Women are still denied agency over their bodies, with access to abortion remaining shackled to the Criminal Code.
The Awakening Foundation, a nonprofit women’s rights group, wrote in a statement published on Nov. 1 that the government deems it necessary to exert control over women’s reproductive autonomy, going so far as to mandate sanctions against those seeking agency over their own bodies.
Indeed, the current laws are framed in a way that ending unplanned pregnancies is not considered a fundamental human right. Instead, the Genetic Health Act (優生保健法) exempts women and those who assist them from prosecution in certain circumstances, including rape, fetal abnormalities or threats to the mental or physical health of the mother.
However, the act fails to address that women are still oppressed by the entrenched patriarchy in Taiwan’s legislative system. Under its provisions, spousal consent is mandatory for married women to get an abortion — a requirement that hardly serves any purpose other than to reinforce state-sanctioned misogyny.
That outdated law allows abusive husbands to exploit their rights, wielding it as leverage to blackmail or retaliate against women seeking an abortion. Vulnerable women are left with a cruel dilemma: carrying pregnancies to term against their will or resorting to unsafe underground medical practices at the risk of prosecution.
With the looming threat of prosecution, how can we ensure women make informed decisions about their bodies that best serve their own interests — not anyone else’s?
This regressive policy places Taiwan at odds with much of the world. A UN report published in 2017 states that only 14 percent of countries require spousal consent, underscoring Taiwan’s outdated attitude toward women’s reproductive health.
In addition, the government has not been shy about limiting women’s choices over their own bodies. Prior to the passage of the Genetic Health Act in 1984, the Criminal Code forbade women to terminate pregnancies even in cases of sexual assault.
Lin Chih-chieh (林志潔), a professor specializing in gender laws at National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, said in her research in 2009 that enacting the Genetic Health Act was never about safeguarding women’s reproductive freedom, but about granting the government control over the population.
Fast-forward four decades later and little has changed.
In the proposed draft, the ministry claimed that decriminalizing abortion was off the table because “illegal” abortions harm the nation’s birthrate. As usual, women are expected to shoulder the responsibility of assuaging society’s panic over Taiwan’s demographic crisis, despite mounting research showing that young people are delaying parenthood because they simply cannot afford it.
Instead of squandering taxpayers’ hard-earned money on prosecuting women for ending unwanted pregnancies, the government can do better by supporting would-be parents in tackling real issues, such as unaffordable housing, stagnant wages, soaring living costs, workplace discrimination and gender inequality.
The laws that reduce women to little more than womb carriers would never encourage them to have more children — real choice and affordable childcare would.
The bottom line is that we must not leave an open door for those who wish to dominate women by holding their bodies hostage. The battle for reproductive justice is not exclusive to women. We do not have the luxury of separating women’s bodily autonomy from broader economic and societal challenges. Decriminalizing abortion and restoring women’s reproductive rights is the first step toward building an equitable society, one that welcomes and empowers potential parents instead of pushing them away.
Lo Yi-ting is a freelance writer based in the UK, focusing on geopolitics and gender-related issues.
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
RSS