US president-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday named US Representative Mike Waltz, a vocal supporter of arms sales to Taiwan who has called China an “existential threat,” as his national security advisor, and on Thursday named US Senator Marco Rubio, founding member of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China — a global, cross-party alliance to address the challenges that China poses to the rules-based order — as his secretary of state.
Trump’s appointments, including US Representative Elise Stefanik as US ambassador to the UN, who has been a strong supporter of Taiwan in the US Congress, and Robert Lighthizer as US trade representative, who was instrumental in the US-China trade dispute during Trump’s first administration, indicate that competing with China would not just be among the Trump administration’s highest priorities, but the organizing principle of US statecraft.
It also indicates that the US would continue its robust support for Taiwan.
The appointments demonstrate that competing with China and revitalizing the US’ technology and industrial sectors would be a high priority of the Trump administration.
Rubio has been a leading figure calling for the US to merge its economic and foreign policies in light of Beijing’s mercantilism.
His vision was most recently set out in a September report released by his office titled “The World China Made: ‘Made in China 2025’ Nine Years Later.”
He said it was intended as a “wakeup call about how serious the threat we face has become. No longer can we fall back on old dogmas and stale talking points.”
Taiwan should be proactive in helping in ways it can. As Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said last week, Taiwan’s chip sector can help fulfill Trump’s “Make America Great Again” campaign slogan. This approach sends the right message.
Leading figures in the Republican Party, such as Waltz and Rubio, believe that the US’ strategic “pivot to Asia” first announced by then-US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton in November 2011 has yet to be realized, as successive US administrations have neither fully prioritized Asia nor taken the threat China poses to its interests seriously.
The US’ distraction by wars in Europe and the Middle East has emboldened Beijing to ramp up its coercion of “American allies and partners, such as Taiwan and the Philippines,” Waltz and Georgetown University professor Matthew Kroenig said in a recent article for The Economist.
They advocated bringing those wars to a “swift conclusion” so the US can focus on what they say is its primary mission of restoring deterrence in Asia.
Trump’s appointments are a signal that his foreign policy team take Waltz’s and Rubio’s arguments about deterrence seriously. However, this must be matched with a similar seriousness at home about the nation’s defenses.
Reports this week that Taiwan has contacted the incoming US administration about procuring up to US$15 billion in military hardware is a positive signal of intent.
Legislators should ensure there is no repeat of fiscal budgets being held up for too long, blocking important defense spending. It was only this week that legislators agreed to review the budget after weeks of impasse. The incoming Republican administration would prioritize actions over words, and the procurement of hard power would be valued over statements.
Trump’s foreign policy would be predicated on allies stepping up and sharing more of the defense cost burden so the US can focus on its primary challenge. Doing so would be a positive development for the US and its allies, as it would put the international order on a more stable and long-term footing. In this, Taiwan has an important role to play.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking