On Friday last week, tens of thousands of young Chinese took part in a bike ride overnight from Henan Province’s Zhengzhou (鄭州) to the historical city of Kaifeng in search of breakfast.
The night ride became a viral craze after four female university students in June chronicled their ride on social media from Zhengzhou in search of soup dumplings in Kaifeng.
Propelled by the slogan “youth is priceless,” the number of nocturnal riders surged to about 100,000 on Friday last week. The main road connecting the two cities was crammed with cyclists as police tried to maintain order. That sparked alarm among Chinese authorities who are wary of young people seeking a sense of liberation in pressured times.
The next day, the city governments and police took action by banning cycling in the main streets, and three major bike-sharing companies announced that rented bikes would be prohibited from leaving the city and would be locked remotely if riders attempted to do so.
Several universities in Zhengzhou prohibited students from riding bikes or leaving campus, with some saying it was a necessary measure as the “night riders” might have been incited by foreign forces.
The night rides are an innovative way for young Chinese to have fun, but such a large gathering has obviously touched the government’s nerves. Authoritarian governments are ever-wary about such gatherings being used to express dissent.
Last month, law enforcers in Shanghai restricted people from wearing Halloween costumes — with police searching people wearing constumes and ordering them to remove their costumes — fearing that they could be subversive or used to mock government officials.
For the Chinese government, university students are seen as a particularly sensitive demographic and a driver of social movements, such as the Tiananmen Square democracy protests in 1989 and the nationwide “white paper” movement protesting Beijing’s zero COVID-19 policy in 2022.
With the Chinese economy in the midst of a painful deceleration, the nation’s young people are facing deteriorating job prospects. Youth unemployment hit a record-high 21.3 percent in June last year. After suspending publication of the data and fiddling with its methodology for six months, youth unemployment was still about 18.8 percent in August.
A record 11.8 million university graduates entering the workforce this year face unemployment and economic insecurity.
A long-term survey conducted by Harvard University and Stanford University academics showed that the ratio of Chinese feeling pessimistic about the future rose from 2.3 percent in 2004 to 16 percent last year, and Chinese who believe that “effort is always awarded in China” dropped from more than 60 percent in 2014 to just 28 percent last year.
There is growing discontent among the Chinese public. Data compiled by Freedom House’s China Dissent Monitor showed an 18 percent rise in reported protests in China in the second quarter of this year compared with the same period last year, mostly driven by economic grievances.
With the Chinese government’s suppression of the night ride — which was a rare moment of escape for young Chinese from the anxiety and uncertain future they face — intended to silence any possible dissent, Taiwanese can see more clearly the difference between living under authoritarianism and democracy.
This is sound evidence as to why Taiwan could never be a part of autocratic China.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
Yesterday, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), once the dominant political party in Taiwan and the historic bearer of Chinese republicanism, officially crowned Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) as its chairwoman. A former advocate for Taiwanese independence turned Beijing-leaning firebrand, Cheng represents the KMT’s latest metamorphosis — not toward modernity, moderation or vision, but toward denial, distortion and decline. In an interview with Deutsche Welle that has now gone viral, Cheng declared with an unsettling confidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin is “not a dictator,” but rather a “democratically elected leader.” She went on to lecture the German journalist that Russia had been “democratized
RSS