On Friday last week, tens of thousands of young Chinese took part in a bike ride overnight from Henan Province’s Zhengzhou (鄭州) to the historical city of Kaifeng in search of breakfast.
The night ride became a viral craze after four female university students in June chronicled their ride on social media from Zhengzhou in search of soup dumplings in Kaifeng.
Propelled by the slogan “youth is priceless,” the number of nocturnal riders surged to about 100,000 on Friday last week. The main road connecting the two cities was crammed with cyclists as police tried to maintain order. That sparked alarm among Chinese authorities who are wary of young people seeking a sense of liberation in pressured times.
The next day, the city governments and police took action by banning cycling in the main streets, and three major bike-sharing companies announced that rented bikes would be prohibited from leaving the city and would be locked remotely if riders attempted to do so.
Several universities in Zhengzhou prohibited students from riding bikes or leaving campus, with some saying it was a necessary measure as the “night riders” might have been incited by foreign forces.
The night rides are an innovative way for young Chinese to have fun, but such a large gathering has obviously touched the government’s nerves. Authoritarian governments are ever-wary about such gatherings being used to express dissent.
Last month, law enforcers in Shanghai restricted people from wearing Halloween costumes — with police searching people wearing constumes and ordering them to remove their costumes — fearing that they could be subversive or used to mock government officials.
For the Chinese government, university students are seen as a particularly sensitive demographic and a driver of social movements, such as the Tiananmen Square democracy protests in 1989 and the nationwide “white paper” movement protesting Beijing’s zero COVID-19 policy in 2022.
With the Chinese economy in the midst of a painful deceleration, the nation’s young people are facing deteriorating job prospects. Youth unemployment hit a record-high 21.3 percent in June last year. After suspending publication of the data and fiddling with its methodology for six months, youth unemployment was still about 18.8 percent in August.
A record 11.8 million university graduates entering the workforce this year face unemployment and economic insecurity.
A long-term survey conducted by Harvard University and Stanford University academics showed that the ratio of Chinese feeling pessimistic about the future rose from 2.3 percent in 2004 to 16 percent last year, and Chinese who believe that “effort is always awarded in China” dropped from more than 60 percent in 2014 to just 28 percent last year.
There is growing discontent among the Chinese public. Data compiled by Freedom House’s China Dissent Monitor showed an 18 percent rise in reported protests in China in the second quarter of this year compared with the same period last year, mostly driven by economic grievances.
With the Chinese government’s suppression of the night ride — which was a rare moment of escape for young Chinese from the anxiety and uncertain future they face — intended to silence any possible dissent, Taiwanese can see more clearly the difference between living under authoritarianism and democracy.
This is sound evidence as to why Taiwan could never be a part of autocratic China.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
Since taking office, US President Donald Trump has upheld the core goals of “making America safer, stronger, and more prosperous,” fully implementing an “America first” policy. Countries have responded cautiously to the fresh style and rapid pace of the new Trump administration. The US has prioritized reindustrialization, building a stronger US role in the Indo-Pacific, and countering China’s malicious influence. This has created a high degree of alignment between the interests of Taiwan and the US in security, economics, technology and other spheres. Taiwan must properly understand the Trump administration’s intentions and coordinate, connect and correspond with US strategic goals.