Among the 11 major areas of the “Healthy Taiwan” plan — encompassing measures related to chronic disease prevention, child health, public mental health support, the health of indigenous people and cancer prevention, among others — there has yet to be any sign of a specific program related to women’s health.
This is in direct contrast to Taiwan’s efforts to become a nation that prioritizes human rights, including the development of the National Human Rights Commission to work toward these ideals, which includes the establishment of treaty review mechanisms for international conventions such as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW).
The convention, in line with the UN system, invites leading human rights experts to review policies. The “Healthy Taiwan” plan’s lack of any major discussion of women’s health is truly a missed opportunity.
The outdated and traditional notion that women have a natural “duty” to reproduce due to their sex has led to the unequal treatment of women in many contexts. The “glass ceiling” in the workplace — an unseen barrier that prevents women from advancing their careers — is a great example of this.
The most important step to eliminating inequalities for women that are caused by sex and reproductive capabilities is to allow women maximum control over reproductive decisions, including both the right to become pregnant and to determine whether to terminate a pregnancy.
CEDAW’s Article 16(1)(e) states that, on the basis of equality of men and women, all states should ensure women have “the same rights to decide freely and responsibly on the number and spacing of their children and to have access to the information, education, and means to enable them to exercise these rights.”
This means that women should have the freedom to make their own decisions regarding the timing and all other circumstances of a pregnancy.
The Medical and Service Delivery Guidance for Emergency Contraception — jointly drafted by the International Consortium for Emergency Contraception and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics — emphasizes that women should be given easy access to emergency contraception and should be able to decide whether to use it without the need to first consult a physician. This not only protects women’s right to choose, but prevents them from being forced to bear the costs and risks of surgical and medical abortions.
Among the top 10 most advanced pharmaceutical states, nine have made emergency contraception available over-the-counter (OTC) — the US, which requires physician consultation for females under 16, the UK, Switzerland, Canada, France, Belgium, Sweden, Australia and Germany. Even Japan implemented a pilot program last year that allows the sale of OTC emergency contraception.
Despite international circumstances having prevented Taiwan from completing the ratification process for most international conventions, Taiwan enacted the Enforcement Act of Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約施行法) in 2011. The act domestically legislated the convention’s provisions.
The reclassification of emergency contraceptive pills is an indispensable piece of the puzzle to ensure the health and rights of women. It should be implemented as soon as possible to meet Taiwan’s goal of becoming a nation prioritizing human rights and make the currently deficient “Healthy Taiwan” plan truly complete.
Huang Jin-shun is president of the Federation of Taiwan Pharmacist Associations.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization