In light of the re-election of former US president Donald Trump, an article by David Sacks, a fellow for Asia Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, recommends that Taiwan increase its defense spending, improve its security partnership with Japan and demonstrate its value as an economic partner to the US.
After taking office in January, Trump will likely apply pressure on Taiwan to increase its defense budget. Although Taiwan raised its defense budget for next year by 7.7 percent to NT$64.7 billion (US$2 billion) — 2.45 percent of its GDP — Trump has proposed that it budget 10 percent of its GDP, an impossible metric.
Taiwan must seriously consider the possibility of gradually increasing its defense budget to 3 or even 5 percent of its GDP within the next few years, or Trump’s dissatisfaction with Taiwan for not having adequately repaid the US might lead him to halt US military aid and threaten to make it pay for US protection.
In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, Trump indicated that if China were to attempt an invasion of Taiwan, he would respond by imposing tariffs of 150 to 200 percent on Chinese goods. When asked if he would use military force to protect Taiwan, his attitude was unclear, emphasizing his positive relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), stating there would be no need for conflict because Xi respects him.
Trump once again plans to use tariffs to solve the “Taiwan problem.” Whether that would be enough to deter China from threatening Taiwan is unclear.
Trump pays close attention to bilateral trade balances, viewing trade deficits as a marker of economic unfairness. Last year, the US’ trade deficit with Taiwan reached US$48 billion. As such, Trump could press Taiwan to buy more US products or ease restrictions to reduce the trade deficit. This focus on economic measures illustrates that his position on Taiwan is oriented toward US economic interests. He could demand that Taiwan pay a “protection fee” to the US to increase defense spending and demonstrate its resolve for self-defense — a proposition that would be difficult for Taiwan to refuse.
Taiwan could take this opportunity not only to complete the delivery of F-16 jets from the US, but also purchase advanced F-35 jets to bolster its defenses against a possible Chinese invasion.
Additionally, weapons systems cooperation — particularly in autonomous drones and other areas — has boosted bilateral military cooperation. Simultaneously, Taiwan could adopt an onshore outsourcing economic model of investing in US manufacturing. For example, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co could build more plants on US soil to strengthen economic ties and high-tech connections.
Trump’s re-election represents a path toward US isolationism. Therefore, Taiwan must improve its self-defense capabilities and look to other regional partners, like Japan, for support.
As for Trump’s stance on Taiwan, perhaps the answer lies in his ultimate assessment of US interests. Taiwan should focus less on abstract ideals and values, and instead engage with Trump in a language he can understand — one of business and transactions — to have pragmatic discussions about mutual benefits and meeting each other’s needs.
Faced with a volatile US administration, Taipei must be self-reliant and completely prepared to handle all possible situations. SpaceX has already adopted a policy requiring its suppliers to move their manufacturing operations outside of Taiwan to avoid geopolitical risk. Taiwanese businesses should leverage opportunities to meet customer demand and accelerate their global expansion to help Taiwan remain secure.
Liao Ming-hui is an assistant researcher at the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS