The attendance of 183 international dignitaries at the Double Ten National Day celebration was an important public measure to affirm Taiwan’s sovereignty and international support. Despite the prominent attendance of three sitting US congressmen, the failure of the US Democratic Party to send any representative is an unfortunate setback for the strong bipartisan support for Taiwan in the US.
With rising polarization between political camps in the US and in Taiwan, increasingly at odds over traditional foreign policy consensuses, it is more important than ever that US support for Taiwan remain bipartisan.
If support for Taiwan becomes polarized, it risks undoing forty years of stable and continuous bipartisan support for providing Taiwan with sufficient defense under the Taiwan Relations Act. Polarization over support for Taiwan would inject the US’ divisive partisan politics and domestic political priorities into its relationship with Taiwan, as is happening with US support for Israel and Ukraine.
With the US Congress in recess until the middle of next month, there is no excuse for the Democratic Party to not send even a single representative to one of the most important commemorations of a critical Indo-Pacific security partner. A recent major hurricane prevented a fourth Republican representative from traveling to Taiwan, but no Democrats cited the hurricane as preventing their international travel. This gross imbalance in US representation promotes an unfortunately growing, yet inaccurate, perception that the US Democratic Party is less supportive of Taiwan.
This image largely comes from the Democrats’ progressive left flank, where skepticism of US confrontation with China and the legacy of Cold War narratives about Taiwan engender a degree of dubiousness about supporting Taiwan.
Despite this setback, the Democratic Party has long been strongly supportive of Taiwan, even including explicit support for Taiwan in its party platform this year, something the Republicans did not include. The Taiwan Relations Act was drafted by a Democratic congressman, passed with overwhelming bipartisan support in a Democrat-controlled Congress and signed by then-US president Jimmy Carter, a lifelong Democrat (who recently turned 100 years old).
Nancy Pelosi, the former US House of Representatives speaker and the most powerful Democrat in Congress in the past century, has been one of Taiwan’s strongest supporters in Washington. Pelosi in 2022 pushed forward with a high-profile visit, despite the rumored objections of US President Joe Biden, who himself voted for the Taiwan Relations Act and has vowed four times to defend Taiwan. Her visit echoed a 1997 visit by then-US House of Representatives speaker Newt Gingrich, a Republican, emphasizing the longstanding robust bipartisan congressional support for Taiwan.
Taiwan has made its own missteps in managing the bipartisan relationship. Obsessive courting of highly partisan and marginal figures such as former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo or former UK prime minister turned far-right influencer and Trump booster Liz Truss has driven away those on the left or even some mainstream Democrats from more prominently supporting Taiwan.
Taiwan continues to funnel hundreds of thousands of dollars toward Pompeo, even though he has no political future in the US, and increasingly calls for radical positions, such as the immediate abandonment of the name “Republic of China,” which are at odds with the “status quo” positions advocated by Taiwan’s main political parties. These prominent and ostentatious acts of Kabuki Theatre draw much attention and even scorn, while achieving little to actually improve Taiwan’s relationship with the US.
Antipathy from the left toward Taiwan is entirely avoidable, given that Taiwanese society has so much in common with their progressive values. Taiwan’s record on indigenous rights, its thriving LGBTQ+ community and the single payer socialized healthcare system provide much for progressives to admire. While far from perfect, Taiwan’s innovations in transitional justice could inspire a model for the reparations that many US progressives aspire toward.
If Taiwanese officials plan to fete Republican hawks such as former US ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley at global security fora, such outreach should be balanced by inviting a delegation of US progressive congressmen and civil society leaders to participate in a dialogue on civil rights for indigenous peoples and models for implementing reparations.
The relationship between the US and Taiwan is a strong and enduring one, built on not just common security interests, but shared democratic values and a thriving Taiwanese-American community. Politicians on both sides should work harder toward more balanced and bipartisan outreach that elides partisan divides.
Sasha B. Chhabra is an analyst, commentator and media consultant on China’s foreign policy, Taiwanese politics and cross-strait affairs.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS