The attendance of 183 international dignitaries at the Double Ten National Day celebration was an important public measure to affirm Taiwan’s sovereignty and international support. Despite the prominent attendance of three sitting US congressmen, the failure of the US Democratic Party to send any representative is an unfortunate setback for the strong bipartisan support for Taiwan in the US.
With rising polarization between political camps in the US and in Taiwan, increasingly at odds over traditional foreign policy consensuses, it is more important than ever that US support for Taiwan remain bipartisan.
If support for Taiwan becomes polarized, it risks undoing forty years of stable and continuous bipartisan support for providing Taiwan with sufficient defense under the Taiwan Relations Act. Polarization over support for Taiwan would inject the US’ divisive partisan politics and domestic political priorities into its relationship with Taiwan, as is happening with US support for Israel and Ukraine.
With the US Congress in recess until the middle of next month, there is no excuse for the Democratic Party to not send even a single representative to one of the most important commemorations of a critical Indo-Pacific security partner. A recent major hurricane prevented a fourth Republican representative from traveling to Taiwan, but no Democrats cited the hurricane as preventing their international travel. This gross imbalance in US representation promotes an unfortunately growing, yet inaccurate, perception that the US Democratic Party is less supportive of Taiwan.
This image largely comes from the Democrats’ progressive left flank, where skepticism of US confrontation with China and the legacy of Cold War narratives about Taiwan engender a degree of dubiousness about supporting Taiwan.
Despite this setback, the Democratic Party has long been strongly supportive of Taiwan, even including explicit support for Taiwan in its party platform this year, something the Republicans did not include. The Taiwan Relations Act was drafted by a Democratic congressman, passed with overwhelming bipartisan support in a Democrat-controlled Congress and signed by then-US president Jimmy Carter, a lifelong Democrat (who recently turned 100 years old).
Nancy Pelosi, the former US House of Representatives speaker and the most powerful Democrat in Congress in the past century, has been one of Taiwan’s strongest supporters in Washington. Pelosi in 2022 pushed forward with a high-profile visit, despite the rumored objections of US President Joe Biden, who himself voted for the Taiwan Relations Act and has vowed four times to defend Taiwan. Her visit echoed a 1997 visit by then-US House of Representatives speaker Newt Gingrich, a Republican, emphasizing the longstanding robust bipartisan congressional support for Taiwan.
Taiwan has made its own missteps in managing the bipartisan relationship. Obsessive courting of highly partisan and marginal figures such as former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo or former UK prime minister turned far-right influencer and Trump booster Liz Truss has driven away those on the left or even some mainstream Democrats from more prominently supporting Taiwan.
Taiwan continues to funnel hundreds of thousands of dollars toward Pompeo, even though he has no political future in the US, and increasingly calls for radical positions, such as the immediate abandonment of the name “Republic of China,” which are at odds with the “status quo” positions advocated by Taiwan’s main political parties. These prominent and ostentatious acts of Kabuki Theatre draw much attention and even scorn, while achieving little to actually improve Taiwan’s relationship with the US.
Antipathy from the left toward Taiwan is entirely avoidable, given that Taiwanese society has so much in common with their progressive values. Taiwan’s record on indigenous rights, its thriving LGBTQ+ community and the single payer socialized healthcare system provide much for progressives to admire. While far from perfect, Taiwan’s innovations in transitional justice could inspire a model for the reparations that many US progressives aspire toward.
If Taiwanese officials plan to fete Republican hawks such as former US ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley at global security fora, such outreach should be balanced by inviting a delegation of US progressive congressmen and civil society leaders to participate in a dialogue on civil rights for indigenous peoples and models for implementing reparations.
The relationship between the US and Taiwan is a strong and enduring one, built on not just common security interests, but shared democratic values and a thriving Taiwanese-American community. Politicians on both sides should work harder toward more balanced and bipartisan outreach that elides partisan divides.
Sasha B. Chhabra is an analyst, commentator and media consultant on China’s foreign policy, Taiwanese politics and cross-strait affairs.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
Liberals have wasted no time in pointing to Karol Nawrocki’s lack of qualifications for his new job as president of Poland. He has never previously held political office. He won by the narrowest of margins, with 50.9 percent of the vote. However, Nawrocki possesses the one qualification that many national populists value above all other: a taste for physical strength laced with violence. Nawrocki is a former boxer who still likes to go a few rounds. He is also such an enthusiastic soccer supporter that he reportedly got the logos of his two favorite teams — Chelsea and Lechia Gdansk —
RSS