Disinformation — the deliberate spreading of false or biased news to manipulate minds — is gaining ground around the world.
As China and Russia sink into authoritarianism and export their methods of censorship and media control, democracies find themselves overwhelmed by an incessant flow of propaganda that threatens the integrity of their institutions.
Taiwan, ranked first for democracy in Asia according to the Economist Intelligence Unit, is also the country that is targeted most by disinformation originating abroad, in this case China, the independent research institute V-Dem said.
The only bulwark against disinformation is a free, independent and plural media, prioritizing the public interest and conditioning the information it publishes on systematic verification of its sources.
However, Taiwanese media, which operate in a relatively free environment (Taiwan ranks 27th out of 180 in Reporters Without Borders’ [RSF] world press freedom ranking this year), too often neglect journalistic ethics for political or commercial reasons. As a result, only three in 10 Taiwanese say they trust the media according to a Reuters Institute survey conducted in 2022, one of the lowest percentages among democracies.
This climate of distrust gives disproportionate influence to platforms, in particular Facebook and Line, despite them being a major vector of false or biased information.
This credibility deficit for traditional media, a real Achilles heel of Taiwanese democracy, puts it at risk of being exploited for malicious purposes, with potentially dramatic consequences.
However, despite the urgency, no major reform has yet seen the light of day. It is true that in Taiwan any public policy affecting the supervision of the media systematically exposes its authors to the easy accusation of a “return to dictatorship.”
On the contrary, such a reform, if it adopted a co-regulation approach, returning journalism practitioners to their responsibilities, could ensure that the media as a whole serves the general public interest rather than that of their shareholders.
We suggest five areas of reform which seem easy to implement and would have a lasting impact:
First, adopt a regulatory framework that encourages and protects the independence of editorial staff vis-a-vis their employers and their boards of directors.
Second, expand the mandate of the broadcast regulator, the National Communications Commission (NCC), to cover all media, including print, online news sites and platforms, and strengthen its independence and resources.
Third, significantly increase, and maintain, the budgets allocated to public media so that they can benefit from the same visibility as private media and strengthen their guarantees of independence.
Fourth, support media outlets that are committed to respecting journalistic ethics, independent fact-checking initiatives and projects that aim to strengthen dialogue with the public.
Fifth, impose on large digital platforms an obligation of discoverability and appropriate moderation of reliable information sources, identified as such on the basis of an independent certification.
As part of a RSF delegation to Taiwan from Monday next week through Friday, we expect to meet President William Lai (賴清德), government and opposition officials, as well as a wide range of media and civil society representatives.
In these meetings we would emphasize the need for such reforms and introduce innovative solutions developed by RSF that can facilitate them, in particular the Forum on Information and Democracy, a laboratory for developing good practices; the Journalism Trust Initiative, the first media platform to receive a International Organization for Standardization certification; the Paris Charter on artificial intelligence and journalism; and the Propaganda Monitor, an observatory recently launched to analyze misinformation from authoritarian regimes.
We are convinced that Taiwan, a regional leader in press freedom and the only democracy in the Chinese-speaking world, has everything to gain from reforming its media regulations so that they are in line with international best practices.
It is at this price that Taiwanese media would regain public trust, a necessity not only to combat disinformation, but also to guarantee their own long-term survival in the face of the social media platforms’ hegemony. The future of journalism is linked to that of democracy and vice versa.
Thibaut Bruttin is the director-general of Reporters Without Borders. Cedric Alviani is the director of RSF’s Asia-Pacific bureau.
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS