On Tuesday last week, after a long silence, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan mentioned Uighurs at the 79th UN General Assembly. “We are sensitive to the protection of the fundamental rights and freedoms of the Muslim Uighur Turks in a way that does not in any way harm the ‘one China policy’ and China’s territorial integrity and sovereign rights,” he said.
Even though Erdogan’s speech did not mention one of the world’s saddest situations — such as that more than 3 million Uighurs live in camps, that Uighur expatriates abroad have been unable to even talk to their families back home on the phone for seven years, a dangerous situation such as the vertical decrease in the birthrate of Uighurs in the past three years — Uighurs are still happy that their name was mentioned.
That is because China’s Uighur policy — whether through foreign relations or in domestic policy — aims to make the world forget about Uighurs and hide the massacre Beijing is committing. That is also why China used its diplomatic power last year to delay the publication of a report on Uighurs prepared by UN experts and also prevented the issue from being discussed at the UN Human Rights Council.
China organizes monthly “Xinjiang visits” to neighboring countries and organizations, shows fake scenes, covers up genocide, and even encourages others from abroad and in neighboring countries to praise this crime. Erdogan’s mentioning Uighurs at the UN is a historic event, a genuine attitude that inspires and gives hope.
That said, Uighurs were mentioned behind the problems of Palestine, Ukraine, Syria and even the Rohingya. Uighurs are grateful, but it is not enough because they did not hear in Erdogan’s speech a strong tone against China, an urgent call to the international community, a concrete demand or an initiative, even a sentence, to improve the situation.
Erdogan has not forgotten the Uighur issue and his presentation on a subject that China, an ally in many international arenas, does not want to listen to, has pleased not only Uighurs, but also the states and organizations that support justice and rights in the world, especially those that support the oppressed and the oppressed. That stance has shown Erdogan’s honesty and courage in his call for justice and rights.
It is known to everyone who pays attention to the issue and whose minds are consciences and alert that while blood flows in wars and conflicts, in the camps and prisons in East Turkestan — Xinjiang to China — blood is turning into pus and bodies are rotting. While mothers cry on battlefields, embracing their children’s corpse, Uighur mothers cannot access the remains of their children or even information about their deaths, and are thrown into prisons for crying or complaining. Bodies are counted on battlefields, but the bodies in the Uighur genocide are not, and China does not allow them to be.
The Uighur situation is much worse than current war zones. The problem deserves to be presented in a loud tone with urgent calls for action. We hope that our brother Turkey’s role in the international arena will be even more active, its stance even more strong and that its side will always be separate from that of the oppressors.
Rebiya Kadeer is a former president of the World Uyghur Congress. Kok Bayraq is a US-based Uighur observer.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS