The Constitutional Court on Friday last week ruled on the constitutionality of the death penalty. Although its ruling makes sense, many opposed the court deciding this case.
As an academic who teaches introductory coursework on criminal procedure law, I am not personally satisfied with the ruling. However, the result is still acceptable.
Compared with the laws of other advanced democracies, the Code of Criminal Procedure (刑事訴訟法) is behind the times. The implementation of criminal hearings is inconsistent with the stipulations of the code. Even to this day, Taiwan is implementing indirect and written case hearings — a process dating back to the Qing Dynasty.
For a deeper understanding, read the essay “The Relationship Between Constitutional Law and the Code of Criminal Procedure” (憲法與刑事訴訟法之關係) in The Code of Criminal Procedure Review, Volume 3, extended edition (刑事訴訟法研究、第三冊、增訂版).
During the latter half of the 1700s, the UK, the US, France, Germany and other Western countries implemented similar laws to that of the Qing Dynasty. All of them used indirect or written hearings in criminal cases.
Despite following several hundred years of judicial experience, these indirect and written hearings were found to have produced many mistrials and misrulings. By the end of the 1700s, and with the rising adoption of more democratic concepts, direct and oral hearings were adopted to reduce the frequency of mistrials.
The most effective of the direct and oral hearings is the jury trial system. However, even with the adoption of such a system, mistrials and misrulings could not be completely avoided. To avoid mistrials and the conviction of innocent people, a legal motto and ethos of being willing to let 10 guilty people go free rather than convict one innocent person came into being.
That being the case, Taiwan’s criminal trials are still operating by the logic of the Qing Dynasty’s indirect and written hearing procedures. Taiwan’s criminal court judges and prosecutors maintain the ideology of the White Terror-era court system operating under martial law.
In contrast with the aforementioned legal motto, there is an underlying concept in Taiwan’s judicial system that it would rather convict 10 innocent people than set one guilty person free.
Consequently, there has been no lack of mistrials involving the conviction of innocent people.
After a wrongful conviction resulting in the death penalty, nothing can be done to remedy the situation after the sentence has been carried out. From that point of view, the Constitutional Court’s ruling in this matter must ultimately be accepted. Hopefully, wise opponents of the death penalty can understand this position.
The abolishment or upholding of the death penalty is predicated on the good nature of Taiwanese. For this issue, the legislature should be the real arbiters of the death penalty’s constitutionality — not the courts.
Simultaneously, the Constitutional Court is at its core a specialized court — a “court” in the narrow sense of the word, also referred to as a “tribunal.” This special tribunal is a product of an authoritarian system. Such a specialized judicial body should not exist in a democracy.
If Supreme Court judges still do not have a grasp of the profundities of constitutional law, they should not be sitting on the nation’s highest court.
The Constitutional Court should be abolished, and its role taken up by the Supreme Court, with judges qualified for that position. This is the correct way forward.
Huan Tong-shong is a former president of National Chung Hsing University.
Translated by Tim Smith
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS