The Constitutional Court on Friday last week ruled on the constitutionality of the death penalty. Although its ruling makes sense, many opposed the court deciding this case.
As an academic who teaches introductory coursework on criminal procedure law, I am not personally satisfied with the ruling. However, the result is still acceptable.
Compared with the laws of other advanced democracies, the Code of Criminal Procedure (刑事訴訟法) is behind the times. The implementation of criminal hearings is inconsistent with the stipulations of the code. Even to this day, Taiwan is implementing indirect and written case hearings — a process dating back to the Qing Dynasty.
For a deeper understanding, read the essay “The Relationship Between Constitutional Law and the Code of Criminal Procedure” (憲法與刑事訴訟法之關係) in The Code of Criminal Procedure Review, Volume 3, extended edition (刑事訴訟法研究、第三冊、增訂版).
During the latter half of the 1700s, the UK, the US, France, Germany and other Western countries implemented similar laws to that of the Qing Dynasty. All of them used indirect or written hearings in criminal cases.
Despite following several hundred years of judicial experience, these indirect and written hearings were found to have produced many mistrials and misrulings. By the end of the 1700s, and with the rising adoption of more democratic concepts, direct and oral hearings were adopted to reduce the frequency of mistrials.
The most effective of the direct and oral hearings is the jury trial system. However, even with the adoption of such a system, mistrials and misrulings could not be completely avoided. To avoid mistrials and the conviction of innocent people, a legal motto and ethos of being willing to let 10 guilty people go free rather than convict one innocent person came into being.
That being the case, Taiwan’s criminal trials are still operating by the logic of the Qing Dynasty’s indirect and written hearing procedures. Taiwan’s criminal court judges and prosecutors maintain the ideology of the White Terror-era court system operating under martial law.
In contrast with the aforementioned legal motto, there is an underlying concept in Taiwan’s judicial system that it would rather convict 10 innocent people than set one guilty person free.
Consequently, there has been no lack of mistrials involving the conviction of innocent people.
After a wrongful conviction resulting in the death penalty, nothing can be done to remedy the situation after the sentence has been carried out. From that point of view, the Constitutional Court’s ruling in this matter must ultimately be accepted. Hopefully, wise opponents of the death penalty can understand this position.
The abolishment or upholding of the death penalty is predicated on the good nature of Taiwanese. For this issue, the legislature should be the real arbiters of the death penalty’s constitutionality — not the courts.
Simultaneously, the Constitutional Court is at its core a specialized court — a “court” in the narrow sense of the word, also referred to as a “tribunal.” This special tribunal is a product of an authoritarian system. Such a specialized judicial body should not exist in a democracy.
If Supreme Court judges still do not have a grasp of the profundities of constitutional law, they should not be sitting on the nation’s highest court.
The Constitutional Court should be abolished, and its role taken up by the Supreme Court, with judges qualified for that position. This is the correct way forward.
Huan Tong-shong is a former president of National Chung Hsing University.
Translated by Tim Smith
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It
RSS