The newly appointed Taiwanese representative to Japan, Lee Yi-yang (李逸洋), has taken office, launching the “Lai era” of Taiwan-Japan relations under President William Lai (賴清德).
While the Taiwan-US relationship is based on security guarantees that Taiwan relies on for survival, Taiwan-Japan relations are based on broad economic, cultural and personnel exchanges. The two nations keep pace with one another and rely on mutual engagement.
The relationship is the best it has been since Japan severed formal diplomatic relations with the Republic of China in 1972. Taiwan’s response the 2011 earthquake and tsunami that led to the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant disaster helped establish a relationship of necessity, exemplified by the saying, “a friend in need is a friend indeed.”
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Taiwan stood out proudly among its peers due to its masterful handling of the situation, which was not lost on Japan. Moreover, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co leads as the world’s most advanced chip manufacturer — something Japan cannot ignore.
Eight years ago, Taiwan’s greatest friend in Japan, the late former prime minister Shinzo Abe, described Taiwan-Japan relations under former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) as a “golden age.” Abe made several policy proposals that enhanced Taiwan-Japan ties. In an environment of good faith upheld by the US and Japan, Taipei’s relationship with Tokyo blossomed.
Gazing far into the Lai era, these ties could be extended further.
Primarily, the bilateral relations are political. Legislative foreign exchanges, or paradiplomacy, are still the swivel upon which the unofficial ties turn.
It was a pleasure to see a succession of Japanese lawmakers visit Taiwan recently, highlighting the high regard that Japan’s political sphere places on Taiwan. Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) and Minister of Culture Li Yuan (李遠) also visited Japan, fostering a new means of holding direct talks between high-level officials.
Despite Japan regrettably defining the bilateral relationship under a framework of “unofficial exchanges of practicality between civilians,” there is plenty to discuss and space remains for further development.
During his time in office, former representative to Japan Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) did much to boost local exchanges. His achievements were remarkable and more proof of the success of this diplomatic development.
A few years ago, I raised the concept of integrating the Taiwanese-Japanese economy in an article published in the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper). I wrote that Taiwan’s most ideal scenario should be to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership.
As it stands, Taiwan has just as little hope of directly joining the US-led Indo-Pacific Economic Framework. Perhaps Taiwan is to face many repeated instances of rejection. However, if it follows the US-Taiwan Initiative on 21st-Century Trade model, the nation could continue to accelerate signing free-trade agreements with other countries. That is a considerable goal the government should strive for.
To add to Taiwanese semiconductor firms’ accolade-worthy success, Lai declared that he would help turn Taiwan into an “artificial intelligence (AI) island.” There is ample room for Taiwan and Japan to team up on AI, next-generation telecommunications and other fields.
Security dialogues and cooperation between Taiwan and Japan are the areas with the most formidable challenges. The government in 2018 established the Institute for National Defense and Security Research think tank, building the primary platform for dialogue with Japan’s National Institute for Defense Studies. The Taiwanese think tank has taken great strides toward institutionalization.
Since 2022, the phrase “a Taiwan contingency is a contingency for Japan” has encapsulated the debate on regional security. Despite Tokyo’s official descriptions of ties with Taipei, the reality is that Taiwan has long been an important facet of Japan’s new security strategies. Within the confines of diplomatic relations, Taiwan-Japan security cooperation should, under US guidance, form a nonofficial Taiwan-Japan-US security pact.
Simultaneously, advancing multinational peacekeeping frameworks with the Philippines, Australia, South Korea and other countries should be another area of focus.
The government should reference former president Lee Teng-hui’s (李登輝) Asia Open Forum and establish “Track II” diplomatic mechanisms that bring together the brightest minds of Taiwanese and Japanese industries, government and academia to regularly provide policy recommendations. This could further advance ties between Taiwan and Japan.
From the accomplishments of former representatives to Japan, it is not difficult to see Lai’s ambitious mindset in personally leading Taiwan’s ties with Japan. Following the acceptance of his diplomatic credentials, Lee Yi-yang is expected to raise Taiwan-Japan relations to greater heights during the Lai era.
John Lim is a project researcher at the University of Tokyo’s Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia.
Translated by Tim Smith
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS