The US House of Representatives on Sept. 9 voted overwhelmingly to pass the Taiwan Conflict Deterrence Act of 2023. The core content of the act is to impose financial sanctions on the most senior officials of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and their immediate relatives with the goal of preventing a Chinese military invasion of Taiwan. This act symbolizes the US’ close attention to Taiwan’s safety and uses strict economic measures to intimidate the CCP from attempting to escalate tensions across the Taiwan Strait.
The act states that the moment China initiates an invasion of Taiwan, financial sanctions would immediately take effect against CCP officials and members of their immediate family. This would include freezing all of their assets in the US and elsewhere. They would also be prohibited from accessing the US financial system.
The act simultaneously calls on the US government to mobilize the international community and urge other nations to impose sanctions on CCP officials. The act’s purpose is to counter the individual wealth and global influence of Chinese leaders, forcing them to think very carefully about issues surrounding Taiwan before acting rashly.
The bill was introduced by US Representative French Hill, who indicated that its intention is to force the CCP to understand that any and all hostile military action against Taiwan would result in severe consequences at both the personal and international levels.
Hill said the US must ensure that senior CCP officials cannot so frivolously threaten Taiwan’s sovereignty without paying a price. He emphasized that imposing sanctions on the wealth of CCP officials would effectively deter their unchecked ambition toward Taiwan.
Aside from the sanctions on CCP officials, the bill also emphasizes that the US would utilize the influence of international financial organizations — in particular the IMF — to unite other nations to jointly pressure China. The US would employ the power of discourse to prevent China from further increasing its influence over currencies and economies. This goal was also behind the Chinese Currency Accountability Act of 2023, which similarly attempts to restrain China’s global economic expansion.
The act illustrates the US’ increasingly tough policy toward China — particularly in the context of Taiwan — and would likely lead to heightened tensions between the two nations. With military affairs in the Taiwan Strait growing more complicated by the day, the US House passed the act to make clear to the world its determination to defend Taiwan.
US economic pressure on China is not limited to the realms of technology and trade, but now extends to sanctions on individual CCP officials. This would undoubtedly intensify hostilities between the two nations. China would likely come up with a sharp response that would garner attention from the international community.
Whether the US’ financial sanctions successfully prevent the CCP from threatening Taiwan would be decided by both international cooperation and the methods employed by the Chinese leadership to respond to this pressure.
The act exhibits the US government’s unyielding attitude toward Taiwan’s defense by utilizing financial sanctions to control China’s aggressive behavior. It has added yet another variable to the China-US relationship and would influence the development of the strategic situation in the Taiwan Strait.
Achieving a balance in the realms of diplomacy, economics and military affairs has become a crucial challenge that must be confronted by the US, Taiwan and the rest of the international community.
Kristy Cho is a writer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
An American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) spokesperson on Saturday rebuked a Chinese official for mischaracterizing World War II-era agreements as proving that Taiwan was ceded to China. The US Department of State later affirmed that the AIT remarks reflect Washington’s long-standing position: Taiwan’s political status remains undetermined and should only be resolved peacefully. The US would continue supporting Taiwan against military, economic, legal and diplomatic pressure from China, and opposes any unilateral attempt to alter the “status quo,” particularly through coercion or force, the United Daily News cited the department as saying. The remarks followed Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs
RSS