As Taiwan invites Indian representatives to discuss introducing 1,000 Indian workers to the country, there is more at stake than economic cooperation. The outcome would not only shape its economics, but also its diplomatic future with India, a partnership crucial to Taiwan’s political destiny.
Taiwan and India have significantly improved their relationship, driven by strategic and economic interests. India holds a key place in Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy, which aims to improve ties with South and Southeast Asian countries. Although the two nations do not have formal diplomatic relations, their developing partnership can counterbalance China’s increasing influence in the region, a concern shared by both countries.
India, with its young population, thriving economy and increasing presence in global geopolitics, can become a critical partner for Taiwan. Introducing Indian migrant workers to the nation on a trial basis is a step in the right direction, but if Taiwan mishandles this stage, it risks not just a crisis of labor, but a possible diplomatic fallout that could undermine its regional ambitions.
While capitalizing on India’s demographic dividend seems like an ideal solution to the nation’s labor worries, Taiwan’s treatment of migrant workers from Southeast Asia suggests a more complex reality. Workers from Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam have been subject to discrimination and exploitation, exposing a deep-rooted problem that must be addressed urgently.
For Indian workers, with their distinct cultural, linguistic and religious backgrounds, the challenges could be even greater. The online backlash last year to reports of Indian workers being recruited highlighted the extent of racism and misinformation about India in Taiwan.
Former minister of labor Hsu Ming-chun’s (許銘春) comments about selectively recruiting Indians based on similarities in appearance, diet and faith further highlighted racial insensitivity.
India values its relationship with Taiwan for economic and geopolitical reasons. As Taiwan seeks to align with India’s “Make in India” and “Act East” policies, it must foster a welcoming environment for Indian workers. If they were to be mistreated, it could erode the goodwill between the two nations, complicating Taiwan’s geopolitical challenges.
This is not just about managing foreign labor. The treatment of Indian workers reflects Taiwan’s values and commitment to democratic ideals. Indian workers are valued globally for their skills, talent and work ethic. If Taiwan genuinely wants to integrate them into its workforce, it must address the structural issues that perpetuate discrimination.
Labor protections need to be bolstered, fair wages provided, working conditions improved, and access to healthcare and legal recourse guaranteed.
Public education campaigns to promote cross-cultural understanding can help dispel harmful stereotypes and counter unfounded insecurities in the public. While cultural events for migrant communities can be useful, lasting progress can happen when Taiwanese move past their misconceptions and appreciate the richness this diversity imparts to the cultural fabric.
Encouraging migrant communities to participate in local community events can help them feel welcome and integrate more smoothly.
By addressing racism, improving labor protection and fostering inclusivity, Taiwan can set a regional precedent of balancing economic aspirations with respect for human rights and dignity.
Successfully rising to this challenge would not only bolster the nation’s economy, but also pave the way for deeper cooperation with India, solidifying a crucial partnership.
Rohini Singh is a freelance writer based in the UK writing on geopolitics, race and social issues.
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Most countries are commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with condemnations of militarism and imperialism, and commemoration of the global catastrophe wrought by the war. On the other hand, China is to hold a military parade. According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, Beijing is conducting the military parade in Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3 to “mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” However, during World War II, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had not yet been established. It
There is an old saying that if there is blood in the water, the sharks will come. In Taiwan’s case, that shark is China, circling, waiting for any sign of weakness to strike. Many thought the failed recall effort was that blood in the water, a signal for Beijing to press harder, but Taiwan’s democracy has just proven that China is mistaken. The recent recall campaign against 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, many with openly pro-Beijing leanings, failed at the ballot box. While the challenge targeted opposition lawmakers rather than President William Lai (賴清德) himself, it became an indirect
A recent critique of former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s speech in Taiwan (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” by Sasha B. Chhabra, Aug. 12, page 8) seriously misinterpreted his remarks, twisting them to fit a preconceived narrative. As a Taiwanese who witnessed his political rise and fall firsthand while living in the UK and was present for his speech in Taipei, I have a unique vantage point from which to say I think the critiques of his visit deliberately misinterpreted his words. By dwelling on his personal controversies, they obscured the real substance of his message. A clarification is needed to
RSS