As Taiwan invites Indian representatives to discuss introducing 1,000 Indian workers to the country, there is more at stake than economic cooperation. The outcome would not only shape its economics, but also its diplomatic future with India, a partnership crucial to Taiwan’s political destiny.
Taiwan and India have significantly improved their relationship, driven by strategic and economic interests. India holds a key place in Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy, which aims to improve ties with South and Southeast Asian countries. Although the two nations do not have formal diplomatic relations, their developing partnership can counterbalance China’s increasing influence in the region, a concern shared by both countries.
India, with its young population, thriving economy and increasing presence in global geopolitics, can become a critical partner for Taiwan. Introducing Indian migrant workers to the nation on a trial basis is a step in the right direction, but if Taiwan mishandles this stage, it risks not just a crisis of labor, but a possible diplomatic fallout that could undermine its regional ambitions.
While capitalizing on India’s demographic dividend seems like an ideal solution to the nation’s labor worries, Taiwan’s treatment of migrant workers from Southeast Asia suggests a more complex reality. Workers from Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam have been subject to discrimination and exploitation, exposing a deep-rooted problem that must be addressed urgently.
For Indian workers, with their distinct cultural, linguistic and religious backgrounds, the challenges could be even greater. The online backlash last year to reports of Indian workers being recruited highlighted the extent of racism and misinformation about India in Taiwan.
Former minister of labor Hsu Ming-chun’s (許銘春) comments about selectively recruiting Indians based on similarities in appearance, diet and faith further highlighted racial insensitivity.
India values its relationship with Taiwan for economic and geopolitical reasons. As Taiwan seeks to align with India’s “Make in India” and “Act East” policies, it must foster a welcoming environment for Indian workers. If they were to be mistreated, it could erode the goodwill between the two nations, complicating Taiwan’s geopolitical challenges.
This is not just about managing foreign labor. The treatment of Indian workers reflects Taiwan’s values and commitment to democratic ideals. Indian workers are valued globally for their skills, talent and work ethic. If Taiwan genuinely wants to integrate them into its workforce, it must address the structural issues that perpetuate discrimination.
Labor protections need to be bolstered, fair wages provided, working conditions improved, and access to healthcare and legal recourse guaranteed.
Public education campaigns to promote cross-cultural understanding can help dispel harmful stereotypes and counter unfounded insecurities in the public. While cultural events for migrant communities can be useful, lasting progress can happen when Taiwanese move past their misconceptions and appreciate the richness this diversity imparts to the cultural fabric.
Encouraging migrant communities to participate in local community events can help them feel welcome and integrate more smoothly.
By addressing racism, improving labor protection and fostering inclusivity, Taiwan can set a regional precedent of balancing economic aspirations with respect for human rights and dignity.
Successfully rising to this challenge would not only bolster the nation’s economy, but also pave the way for deeper cooperation with India, solidifying a crucial partnership.
Rohini Singh is a freelance writer based in the UK writing on geopolitics, race and social issues.
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS