In his inaugural speech, President William Lai (賴清德) outlined a clear vision for Taiwan’s future, emphasizing the nation’s strategic role in the global supply chain amid shifting geopolitical tides. He underscored the centrality of the “five trusted industry sectors” — semiconductors, artificial intelligence (AI), the military, security and surveillance, and next-generation communications — in this vision. These sectors are not only vital to Taiwan’s economic development, but also characterized by their energy-intensive nature. As AI and semiconductor industries rapidly expand in Taiwan, concerns about the sufficiency of the nation’s power supply are becoming increasingly critical.
Taiwan’s economy stands out among developed nations because high-tech manufacturing still accounts for more than one-third of its GDP. While other advanced economies have shifted toward services and outsourced manufacturing, Taiwan remains a global manufacturing powerhouse, particularly in the semiconductor industry. Taiwan is the undisputed leader, with a share of about 63 percent of the global market, with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co alone controlling 56 percent of the global foundry market. Other manufacturers like United Microelectronics Corporation and ASE Technology also contribute significantly through foundry services, packaging and testing, making Taiwan indispensable to the global tech ecosystem.
However, these accomplishments come with a heavy energy burden. Semiconductor manufacturing is one of the most energy-intensive industries in the world. Advanced fabrication technologies, particularly those below 7 nanometers, require large amounts of electricity to power clean rooms, cooling systems and precision equipment. As semiconductor demand continues to grow, so does the energy needed to power this crucial industry.
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) recently highlighted Taiwan’s energy concerns during his recent visit, stressing that power limitations could deter investments in critical sectors such as AI and supercomputing. His warning underscores a broader challenge Taiwan faces: How to balance its growing demand for energy with its need for energy security, all while navigating geopolitical risks and the global energy transition.
Taiwan’s energy mix is imbalanced and heavily dependent on imports. As of last year, fossil fuels accounted for a staggering 81.8 percent of the nation’s electricity generation. Renewable energy sources, including wind, solar, hydro, and waste-generated power, contributed just 9.9 percent, despite years of government efforts to increase their share. Meanwhile, nuclear power, which has long been a reliable and relatively low-carbon energy source for Taiwan, provides 7 percent of the nation’s electricity and pumped storage accounts for 1.2 percent.
Taiwan’s extreme reliance on imported energy sources poses significant risks. Nearly 98 percent of its fossil fuels are imported, primarily from the Middle East. This dependency on foreign energy, particularly in a region where China’s influence is expanding, raises concerns about Taiwan’s long-term energy security. Geopolitical tensions could disrupt supply chains, driving up costs and exacerbating energy shortages, potentially hampering Taiwan’s critical industries.
Despite these challenges, Taiwan remains committed to achieving a “nuclear-free homeland” by next year, a policy introduced by former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). The government’s plan hinges on phasing out nuclear energy and ramping up renewable energy to 20 percent of the energy mix. However, the reality on the ground is far from ideal. Although Taiwan has made remarkable progress in expanding renewable energy, the share of renewables in the energy mix remains well below next year’s target, sitting at just 9.9 percent last year. Achieving the goal of a nuclear-free homeland might be within reach, but without sufficient renewable energy capacity, Taiwan risks an overreliance on fossil fuels, which could hinder its climate goals and leave it vulnerable to energy price shocks.
The debate surrounding nuclear energy in Taiwan has often been framed in overly simplistic terms — pro-nuclear versus anti-nuclear, or environmentalists versus industry. This polarization misses a crucial point: Energy security is not just about the type of energy Taiwan uses; it is about ensuring a stable, affordable and reliable supply of energy for the long term. The International Energy Agency defines energy security as the uninterrupted availability of energy sources at an affordable price. For Taiwan, energy security means diversifying its energy sources and suppliers, reducing its reliance on any single type of energy, and ensuring that its energy infrastructure can support the needs of its industries.
Phasing out nuclear energy is relatively straightforward compared with the challenge of rapidly scaling up renewable energy. Doubling renewable generation requires significant investments in infrastructure, technology and grid capacity, none of which can be achieved overnight. Taiwan’s unique position as a high-tech manufacturing hub means that continuous, affordable energy is not just a luxury — it is a necessity. Its semiconductor and AI industries, in particular, rely on uninterrupted power to maintain their global competitiveness. The idea that renewable energy can fully replace nuclear or thermal power in the near term is unrealistic, especially in an island nation where energy imports are a critical lifeline.
Taiwan’s energy security is a complex and serious issue, one that cannot be sacrificed to populist or activist sentiment. The future of Taiwan’s energy mix must be determined through a rational, fact-based lens, with a clear focus on maintaining economic competitiveness and global leadership in high-tech industries. Phasing out nuclear energy without an adequate replacement would only strain Taiwan’s already fragile energy system and hamper the net zero emissions target. To ensure its energy future, Taiwan must prioritize a balanced and diversified energy mix. The nation’s economic future and its role in the global supply chain depend on it.
Harun Talha Ayanoglu is a research associate at the Taiwan Center for Security Studies.
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Before the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can blockade, invade, and destroy the democracy on Taiwan, the CCP seeks to make the world an accomplice to Taiwan’s subjugation by harassing any government that confers any degree of marginal recognition, or defies the CCP’s “One China Principle” diktat that there is no free nation of Taiwan. For United States President Donald Trump’s upcoming May 14, 2026 visit to China, the CCP’s top wish has nothing to do with Trump’s ongoing dismantling of the CCP’s Axis of Evil. The CCP’s first demand is for Trump to cease US
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to