Up to 24 percent of homeroom teachers for the upper grades of Taipei elementary schools are substitute teachers acting as semi-permanent teachers, a deeply problematic situation that deserves the Ministry of Education’s attention.
Under the Teachers’ Act (教師法), teachers are required to serve as homeroom teachers. If a school has an established system and a good culture, it should prioritize making full-time teachers homeroom teachers, rather than relying on substitute teachers. Serving as a homeroom teacher is daunting for new educators unfamiliar with a school and its students.
Another issue is that some substitute teachers might pass the teachers’ exam to become regular teachers in a year, while others might want to transfer to other schools. As a result, students are likely to have a new homeroom teacher every other year.
Students need to be guided by more experienced teachers who know them. The current situation is not suited to helping students with special needs or good class management.
It is unimaginable that a “points system” for teachers could be used to intimidate substitute teachers, because, generally, permanent teachers are given priority for administrative posts or to act as homeroom teachers. As the law does not include administrative duties in the obligations of teachers, they have a legitimate reason to avoid such tasks. However, as being homeroom teachers is required, schools should give priority to regular teachers for those posts, and should not exempt certain teachers because they have accumulated more points.
The ministry attaches great importance to eradicating bullying in schools, but is it not another form of bullying when full-time teachers pass homeroom responsibilities to substitute teachers? The Control Yuan should investigate this problem.
Chen Chi-nung is the principal of Shuili Junior High School in Nantou County.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission