On Monday, China announced the lifting of its ban on imports of Taiwanese pomeloes, bringing an end to the two-year restriction.
However, according to a detailed list published by the Chinese government, import permits would be limited to Taiwanese pomeloes produced by orchards in Hualien County. Other areas, including Tainan, Taiwan’s largest pomelo-growing region, were not included on the new list.
Not only did these omissions cause many to question the rationale for this decision, it exposed China’s political manipulation of cross-strait economic and trade relations.
Beginning in August 2022, China temporarily paused imports of Taiwanese citrus fruits, including pomeloes, citing pesticide residue and quarantine issues.
However, this week’s measure to resume imports has clear implications for China’s goal of achieving unification with Taiwan.
According to a statement by China’s Taiwan Affairs Office spokesman Chen Binhua (陳斌華): “As long as the so-called 1992 consensus is upheld and Taiwanese independence is opposed, then China and Taiwan are like one family.”
This kind of rhetoric is clearly an attempt to use economic and trade benefits as baits to hook Taiwan’s cities and counties, and gain political influence by creating divisions within the nation.
The two main production sites of Taiwanese pomeloes are Madou District (麻豆) in Tainan and Rueisui Township (瑞穗) in Hualien County, which account for 29 percent and 19 percent of Taiwan’s pomelo production respectively. In this case, China only approved Hualien’s orchards and did not include those in Tainan.
This choice has led some to suspect that China purposefully excluded Tainan, where the ruling Democratic Progressive Party has long held office, with the goal of exerting political pressure.
Beijing said that only packaging companies and orchards that have been examined and approved by Chinese officials would be allowed to export to China.
In response, Taiwan’s Bureau of Animal and Plant Health Inspection and Quarantine called on China to provide more transparent quarantine terms and conditions to avoid the measure being used as an excuse for political manipulation.
The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said that the way in which China resumed Taiwanese pomelo imports is similar to its earlier actions on Taiwanese pineapple, sugar apple and grouper imports.
In all of these cases, China used economic and trade measures as a tool to promote “reunification” by only allowing imports of products from specific areas.
The MAC said that China should not use economic and trade measures as an economic coercion tool against Taiwan’s agricultural and fishing industries. It also appealed to Taiwanese farmers to respond to China’s market instability with caution to protect themselves from future harm.
On the surface, China’s decision to lift its ban on Taiwanese pomelo imports appears to be an act of goodwill by the Chinese government, but its selective nature and limited conditions reveal its true intentions.
To resist China’s economic pressure, Taiwan should remain alert and implement strategies to strengthen the pluralization of domestic markets and decrease reliance on a single market. This would help to ensure the long-term, stable development of our agriculture and fishing industries.
Gong Lin-dong is a research fellow who focuses on the Chinese Communist Party.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS