Taiwanese actor and singer Greg Hsu (許光漢) was sent to the alternative service training center at the Chenggong Ling (成功嶺) Training Camp in Taichung for his compulsory military service. Allegations were made that he was not receiving enough food.
The Ministry of the Interior responded that the mess hall servers at the camp allot portions based on the individual trainee’s needs. If a trainee is not receiving enough food, each squadron can open up its own additional self-serve dining options. It is misleading to say they are not getting enough food to eat.
Having been born before 1994 like Hsu, I also served for one year in alternative service. When I was doing my basic training at Chenggong Ling, our three daily meal portions were insufficient. Even though our squad leader added to our rations, we hardly had any extra food to divvy up. Only those sitting close to the cafeteria buffet were able to scoop out extra food. Those sitting further away mostly went back to their seats with bowls empty and bellies growling. Before long, different squads of alternative servicemen would yell and berate each other for grabbing too much food. This was a commonplace experience for those doing alternative service.
One reason that alternative service conscripts do not have enough to eat is that their food budget is too low, at about NT$100 per meal. Food suppliers simply cannot provide enough on such a slim budget.
Another reason is that the distribution of food rations is unequal. The command staff at the Chenggong Ling has so much food that they are left to waste, leading conscripts to relish going on official trips to headquarters to “scavenge for food.” Clearly, increasing the food budget, as well as equitable distribution of food rations, would go a long way toward solving the problem.
The training for Chenggong Ling conscripts lasts only 20 days. Whether or not the rations are sufficient is something that could be improved.
Following are a few suggestions to improve conscription service:
First, the training halls could be better used during training time, as well as in the evenings. On paper, it appears as if the daily operations and scheduling at the alternative service center are filled to the brim with activity, but more than half of the time, conscripts are staring into space in classrooms, chatting or playing card games. They ought to be using this free time to improve civil defense training and nationwide civil defense mobilization courses to improve conscripts’ national consciousness, as well as basic soldiering skills and abilities.
Second, with the conscription service period being extended to one year for males born after 1994, the Department of Conscription Services should broaden the conscript penalization process for severe breaches of discipline to prevent an increase in fighting or vandalism infractions. It should give units much more leeway and autonomy for doling out punishment. Not every single infraction needs to be reviewed or reported to the department. Lessening the paperwork would go a long way in speeding up the process of disciplinary action.
From my own experience in management, the vast majority of conscripts follow the rules. If a minority of conscripts continuously break the law or breach discipline, but never receive a punishment, their conduct not only rots away the accountability mechanism, it also produces a “broken window” effect. This leads to even more conduct breaches by conscripts. Trainers ought to swiftly punish those who breach the rules to avoid the spread of a mindset that is conducive to dereliction and misconduct.
Chao Hsuey-wen is an assistant professor and holds a doctorate in law from Fu Jen Catholic University.
Translated by Tim Smith
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS