Recently, the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) published three of my articles on the US presidential election, which is to be held on Nov. 5.
I would like to share my perspective on the intense and stalemated presidential election with the people of Taiwan, as well as Taiwanese and Chinese Americans in the US.
The current consensus of both major US political parties is to counter China and protect Taiwan. However, I do not trust former US president Donald Trump.
He has questioned the US’ commitment to defending Taiwan and explicitly stated the significant challenges involved in doing so.
“Trump believes that China is the real threat, which is why he might take the approach of forcing Ukraine and Russia to negotiate, with the aim of focusing all efforts on dealing with the Chinese Communist Party [CCP],” a National Taiwan University professor told me.
“Therefore, Taiwan need not worry, but I say, if he abandons Ukraine, he will need to work very hard to convince Taiwanese and America’s allies in East Asia that he will maintain at least as strong a security commitment to Taiwan and East Asia as [US President Joe] Biden,” the professor added.
Due to the nature of the US election system, voters often have to choose the lesser of two evils. Although neither of the main presidential candidates is ideal, Trump is an unpredictable, self-centered, authoritarian figure prone to blaming others and acting arrogantly and rudely.
His words and actions have already damaged the dignity and mutual trust within his party and in US politics as a whole.
The first requirement of a democratic society is to abide by election rules and laws.
His tacit approval and even encouragement of the January 2021 riot at the Capitol in Washington is something that no democratic country should tolerate.
During his time as president, Trump was often restrained by experienced advisers and established institutions.
However, if re-elected, he might boldly pursue more unilateral and unconventional policies.
A polarized US, pursuing isolationism abroad, would only encourage the expansion of authoritarian regimes and would not benefit Taiwan.
I speculate (hopefully not mistakenly) that Taiwanese opposition to unification with the CCP is purely based on the principles of democracy, freedom, the rule of law and the preservation of sovereignty — not for any selfish or ethnic reasons.
Based on that assumption, Taiwanese and Americans should support Ukraine’s bloody struggle against Russia to protect its sovereignty.
Taiwan must stand in solidarity with all freedom-loving people around the world; everyone must unite, or else we will all bear the consequences together.
Also based on that speculation, Taiwanese and Americans must oppose the US presidential candidate who just three years ago could not face electoral defeat and tacitly approved a mob attack on the US Capitol Building, which is the highest symbol of US sovereignty.
Respect for election results is the most basic requirement of democracy.
If not, what is the justification of the Taiwanese independence movement?
I hope my speculations and humble opinions are not a misreading of Taiwanese public opinion.
Simon Tang is an adjunct professor at California State University, Fullerton, who lectures on international relations.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS