The government is considering building a semiconductor cluster in Europe, specifically in the Czech Republic, to support Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) new fab in Dresden, Germany, and to help local companies explore new business opportunities there.
Europe wants to ensure the security of its semiconductor sector, but a lack of comprehensive supply chains there could pose significant risks to semiconductor clusters.
The Czech government is aggressively seeking to build its own semiconductor industry and showing strong interest in collaborating with Taiwanese companies. Executive Yuan Secretary-General Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) on Friday said that Taiwan is optimistic about building a semiconductor cluster in the Czech Republic over the next three to five years. Following a visit to the country last month, Kung said he believes the Central European country can serve as a hub or a springboard for Taiwanese semiconductor companies seeking business opportunities in Europe.
He said some companies planned to set up offices in Prague later this year and run a logistics center next year in the city of Usti nad Labem, where the Czech government suggested Taiwan could build a semiconductor cluster.
About 20 local companies, including Topco Scientific Co, Gudeng Precision Industrial Co and Advanced Echem Materials Co, were represented in the delegation that Tung led to the nation, but none of them have affirmed the government’s call to support building a supply chain in Europe. They seem uncertain about investing in an unfamiliar territory amid shifts in the industry due to geopolitical risks.
Now that semiconductors are regarded as a strategic technology related to national security, the EU, the US and Japan are racing to build their own local supply chains by offering lucrative subsidies and tax incentives. TSMC and other Taiwanese semiconductor manufacturers have become the most sought-after investors, as they manufacture the most advanced chips used in Nvidia Corp’s artificial intelligence-related products, Apple Inc’s iPhones and Amazon.com’s data centers.
To satisfy its customers’ need to boost supply-chain resilience, TSMC is ushering in a new era of rapid global expansion and shifting away from its strategy of concentrating chip manufacturing in Asia and in Taiwan for its cutting-edge chips. The chipmaker is building advanced plants in Arizona; Kumamoto, Japan; and Dresden.
Although Europe is home to the major vehicle chip supplier NXP Semiconductor NV, Infineon Technologies AG, industrial chemical supplier Merck AG and ASML Holding NV, it lacks numerous key elements in the complicated process of semiconductor production, not to mention the differences in work culture compared with Taiwan and the outsize influence of labor unions on the continent.
It is a different story in Japan. Taiwanese semiconductor equipment, and packaging and testing service providers are following in the steps of TSMC there, as Japan plays a crucial role in supplying key chemicals, raw materials and equipment to major companies. A slew of Taiwanese suppliers of TSMC have set up new sites in Kyushu or are preparing to do so.
Gudeng, the sole supplier of extreme ultraviolet pods to TSMC, said it plans to build a new plant in Kurume, Japan, to start operations in the first quarter of 2026. ASE Technology Holding Co, the world’s biggest chip tester and packager, last month said it planned to buy 16 hectares of land in Kyushu for about NT$701 million (US$21.86 million) to build an advanced testing and packaging plant.
A similar work culture and a better supply chain are the key reasons that Taiwanese companies are apt to invest in Japan rather than the US and Europe. For the moment, creating a semiconductor cluster in Europe seems to be wishful thinking.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its