Officials last week disqualified a Chinese competitor for attempting to remove a Taiwanese flag during the opening ceremony of the Australasian Handgun Championships in Indonesia.
While tampering with someone else’s flag is considered barbaric and uncivilized from the perspective of democratic countries, it is an act commonly seen in China.
In China, there are idioms about convincing people with virtue and submitting willingly, while ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) says that “he who uses force as a pretense of humaneness is a hegemon.”
Such ancient teachings have not been learned in China, not to even mention the idea of tolerance for opponents, a kind of democratic literacy.
When someone like Mencius described threatens another, they seek pleasure and do not care if the other person submits willingly.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) never cares about how many “Taiwanese comrades” submit willingly when they send military aircraft across the Taiwan Strait median line.
It also does not care how many Taiwanese would identify with their “motherland” when it passed a law authorizing the death penalty for “diehard Taiwanese independence separatists.”
Chinese officials, media and academics often say that after annexing Taiwan they would “keep the island, but not the people” or “re-educate” Taiwanese, like what they are doing to Uighurs in Xinjiang internment camps.
Do more Taiwanese agree with “reunification” after the CCP made these claims? Those who support unification decreased to 1.5 percent, a recent survey showed.
I always say that “I am not fond of supporting independence, but I am compelled to do it.”
If Taiwan, which scored 94 out of 100 in Freedom House’s Freedom in the World report, were to be annexed by China, which scored 9, it would lose its freedom immediately.
No one wants to unify with China except minions and bootlickers. Taiwanese support for independence is a result of the CCP’s menacing behavior.
The CCP still cannot understand that only democratization can attract talent, while autocracy deters them.
Nazi Germany was such an example. Physicist Albert Einstein, who was born in Germany, went to the US to escape Nazi persecution. After Germany annexed Austria, Sigmund Freud, a renowned psychoanalyst, went to the UK to escape the Nazis. Similarly, Erich Fromm, who was born in Frankfurt, escaped to Switzerland and later to the US to further his academic career, becoming an established psychologist.
There are many more examples, to mention but a few. Autocracy cannot tolerate scientists, philosophers, historians and artists. Running away from tyranny, talent went to the US to seek freedom. It was Nazi Germany that declined.
It has not been long since Nazi Germany’s demise. The CCP might as well count how many talented people they have lost.
Reflecting on Japan’s pre-war militarism, Masao Maruyama, a leading Japanese political theorist, said that when he was young, the whole of Japan was like the Aum Shinrikyo doomsday cult — it followed a logic that did not make sense outside Japan, but was prevalent throughout the whole country.
The CCP should no longer indulge in nationalism. To make its citizens happy and to attract talent from abroad, the CCP would have to stop living in seclusion and democratize. Otherwise, Taiwan would stay further away.
Lee Hsiao-feng is an honorary professor at National Taipei University of Education.
Translated by Fion Khan
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS