On Thursday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) presided over the first meeting of the Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee, in which experts shared great insights. I shall also give my opinion as follows:
For all students: Taiwan should include courses on mental health in primary and secondary-school curricula to remove stigma towrd mental illnesses, and to enhance emotional intelligence and psychological resilience.
To achieve these goals, teachers should be provided with materials and vocational training.
For vulnerable students: The nation should establish an early-stage care system. All teachers should undergo vocational training on mental health that would provide them with the knowledge and capability to care for students and identify those in need.
The aim is to provide a “healing” campus for students.
For students in need of psychological help: Taiwan should combine psychiatric care and the existing counseling system to support the latter.
Every student faces a different kind of mental challenge. Some of these challenges can improve with the help of teachers, counselors and psychologists.
Some students have emotional disorders, while some have difficulties with impulse control, and some are at risk of injuring themselves or others.
There might be biological reasons, family issues or social factors contributing to their circumstances.
However, the lack of psychiatric care support exhausts teachers and counselors.
There should be an inter-departmental working group between the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Health and Welfare to promote mental health on campus.
Resources such as campus security systems, counseling services, hospitals and clinics should be integrated with to promote knowledge relating to mental health, remove stigma, identify and care for students in need, provide early intervention and offer treatments in terms of medicine, counseling and family therapy.
If young people take good care of their mental and physical health, it would prepare them to face pressure in life such as in the workplace and with family, and to pursue life goals and contribute positively to society.
Lin Jin-jia is a psychiatrist.
Translated by Fion Khan
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS