Well-respected Hakka leader and physician Tseng Kuei-hai (曾貴海), born in a Hakka village in Pingtung County’s Jiadong Township (佳冬), passed away from illness on Aug. 6. He held many posts throughout his career, including operations director of the Literary Taiwan Foundation, director of the Chung Li-ho Literary Foundation, president of the Taiwanese Pen Tai-bun Pit-hoe, convener of the Weiwuying Metropolitan Park promotional committee, founder of the Southern Taiwan Society and many more.
Tseng also composed countless celebrated pieces of poetry in Mandarin, Hakka and Taiwan Taiwanese (“Taiwan Taiyu”). Hometown, Magnolia Tree (原鄉夜合) and Scene (畫面) are the respective translations of the titles of his Hakka and Taiwanese-language poetry anthologies.
One small secret unknown to most about Tseng is that using the term “Taiwan Taiwanese” was actually his idea. On Dec. 1, 2018, Tiunn Hok-chu (張復聚), former president of the Southern Taiwan Society, a group for Hakka young people, and I visited Tseng. We sought advice on how to ensure Taiwan’s subjectivity and handle the official name of the Taiwanese language without harming other ethnic groups.
He suggested using the terms Taiwan Taiwanese, Taiwan Hakka and Taiwan indigenous language, namely the addition of “Taiwan” to emphasize that they are all Taiwanese languages. Adding “Taiwan” to Taiwanese to form the phrase Taiwan Taiwanese, while verbose, could avert doubts and negative responses from the older and more traditional generation of Hakka, he said.
Colloquially, Taiwan Taiwanese can still be shortened to Taiwanese, thus coinciding with the name most people are already accustomed to using. After years of effort, the Hakka Affairs Council was finally persuaded.
In August 2022, the Executive Yuan formally ruled that it would change the official term from Minnanyu (閩南語, Southern Min) to Taiwan Taiwanese.
Taiffalo Chiung is vice president of the Southern Taiwan Society and a professor in the Department of Taiwanese Literature at National Cheng Kung University.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS