President William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week called for democratic nations to work together to meet the challenges posed by a revisionist China to international security. “China intends to change the rules-based international order,” he told the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei. “That is why democratic countries must come together and take concrete action.”
The annual security dialogue offers Taiwan an opportunity to bring top officials and policy experts to Taipei to discuss security issues, express solidarity and remind Beijing that Taiwan is not alone. It also allows Lai to speak directly to an international audience and assure the nation’s allies about Taiwan’s determination to uphold peace and security in the region, and demonstrate that under his administration, the nation is a reliable, like-minded partner.
Rhetorical signaling is a crucial component of any nation’s alliance maintenance, as narrating a foundation of shared norms, interests and vision of international organizations binds like-minded nations together in a common cause to uphold their vision of international order. Lai is carrying on the legacy of former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in narrating Taiwan’s centrality in the democratic alliance to resist the expansion of autocracy.
However, on the domestic front, Lai’s narrative of what Taiwan is fighting for is subtly different, particularly when speaking to the military. His recent speeches show a leader shaping a narrative about homeland and identity — what Taiwan is, what the military is fighting for and why.
Although Taiwan democratized three decades ago, the by-effects of democratization — an elevation of Taiwanese consciousness and identification with Taiwan as the homeland — have developed unevenly, no place more so than in the military.
Democracy has brought meaningful reforms to the military — its allegiance is no longer first and foremost to the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), but to the nation, and it now answers to civilian command.
However, what the military thinks of itself in the context of democratization and concomitant Taiwanization is quite another matter. As an institution founded to “unify and rejuvenate China,” and which still reveres Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), an ambiguity lingers for it about what the nation is and who the enemy is. Lai is seeking to change that.
Speaking to soldiers in Kinmen County on Friday last week at an event on the 66th anniversary of the 823 Artillery Bombardment, Lai said: “We are no longer trying to ‘retake the mainland’ [China], but we are also unwilling to be ruled by the Chinese Communist Party. We want to continue a life of democracy, freedom, human rights and rule of law.”
Lai is also seeking to banish the defeatist mentality, common among conservative generals, that resistance to China is futile — a view not based on reality and in no small part influenced by an out-of-date emotional attachment to China.
“We cannot fail to distinguish between friends and foes, and should never accept a capitulationist attitude of ‘the first battle is the final battle,’” he told military cadets in June.
Strengthening Taiwan’s military identity and bringing it in closer alignment with the expectations of society is long overdue. A stronger identity would also bring greater clarity on military objectives and what service personnel are defending.
The process of democratization is still ongoing. For allies, it might seem that Taiwan is not reforming its defense as quickly as it could. However, military strategy is downstream of military identity, which would take time to reform.
Leaders are still navigating the legacy of 55 years of KMT one-party rule, but Lai’s recent speeches show a renewed focus on bringing the military in line with Taiwan’s political evolution.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS