China’s ticket tactics
Chinese hip-hop artist Wang Yitai (王以太) was scheduled to perform in Taiwan on Sept. 14 and 15 as part of a tour.
However, his promotional materials included the phrase “Next Stop: Taipei, China” which was clearly a dig to diminish Taiwan’s international status and undermine Taiwan’s sovereignty.
The wording caught the attention of the government, as it contravened the Regulations on Permission for Entrance of People of the Mainland Area Into the Taiwan Area (大陸地區人民進入臺灣地區許可辦法). The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) barred Wang from performing in Taiwan.
However, the concert organizers had sold tickets before applying for permission to hold the event, seemingly to leverage the power of ticket holders to pressure the government.
This approach is not only a breach of regulations and harms the rights of fans, it also exploits Taiwan’s democracy, which values the public’s voice.
By selling tickets before receiving approval, China appears to be testing Taiwan’s resolve. If Wang is unable to come to Taiwan and the organizers refuse to refund the tickets, the blame would fall on the government, suggesting that the financial losses should be borne by the MAC. This would cause conflict in Taiwan.
The incident reveals China’s intention to weaken Taiwan’s international standing in the name of cultural exchange. The maneuver also exerts political pressure on Taiwan, aiming to force the government to either accept the “China Taipei” designation or to face internal disruption.
No one wants to spend money on concert tickets only to have it disappear due to government entry restrictions.
The tactic is clever and Taiwanese must be vigilant against being led by China.
Chang Ya-jou
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS