Two rival takeover bids for Shin Kong Financial Holding Co capped a dramatic week for Taiwanese financial institutions last week and raised eyebrows among all parties involved. The company is facing two possibilities: a friendly merger of two companies to create a new entity through an offer by Taishin Financial Holding Co, or a hostile takeover bid by CTBC Financial Holding Co, which is attempting to gain control of Shin Kong Financial by going directly to the company’s shareholders rather than its management.
On Thursday night, Taishin Financial announced its offer: It would issue new shares and swap 0.6022 of its common shares for each Shin Kong Financial common share, in addition to a 1:1 swap ratio for their preferred shares. Taishin Financial’s bid came after CTBC Financial on Tuesday last week announced its tender offer for Shin Kong Financial. On Friday, CTBC Financial unveiled the terms of its deal: It offers NT$4.09 per share in cash and would swap 0.3132 of its shares for each Shin Kong Financial share.
Any deal for Shin Kong Financial — whose businesses cover insurance, banking, brokerage, investment trust and venture capital — would be the first financial holding company merger in the nation since Fubon Financial Holding Co’s acquisition of Jih Sun Financial Holdings Co in late 2022. The scale of financial holding companies has doubled in the past 10 years and their impact on the financial market has grown significantly following several major mergers and acquisitions (M&A) over the years.
Speculation about new financial M&As has been going around since the start of this year, including King’s Town Bank’s potential search for a buyer and Shin Kong Financial’s renewed merger talks with Taishin Financial after years of on-and-off negotiations. However, whether a deal is successfully concluded depends on the target company’s shareholders and, ultimately, the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC).
In June, FSC Chairman Peng Jin-lung (彭金隆) said he would support any merger of financial holding companies as long as it helps enhance their competitiveness, complies with regulations, protects shareholders’ rights and ensures market stability. However, an M&A involving state-run financial holding firms is less likely in the near term, as they typically face significant challenges, including potential political hurdles and labor resistance. Privately run financial conglomerates face less opposition.
Taishin Financial and Shin Kong Financial expect to submit their respective proposals to their shareholders on Oct. 9 and then set a date for the merger after receiving regulatory approval. CTBC Financial plans to submit its tender offer for review by the commission this week before initiating moves to purchase up to 51 percent of Shin Kong Financial shares on the open market. The FSC’s role is to ensure fair and equitable treatment by providing a level playing field for the two rivals in this race.
The commission must ensure that Taishin Financial and Shin Kong Financial can successfully convene their respective extraordinary shareholders’ meetings on Oct. 9 to discuss the merger deal, and that CTBC Financial can smoothly launch a tender offer for Shin Kong Financial. The commission must thoroughly review the qualifications of Taishin Financial and CTBC Financial, including their financial viability and capital adequacy, as well as their post-merger plans for clients, depositors, policyholders and employees. Moreover, the commission must stay alert to any unusual movements from people seeking to profit from news about the M&A to safeguard market order and protect the interests of stakeholders.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS