Today marks President William Lai’s (賴清德) 100th day in office. Most campaigns promise to enact much of their platform within the first 100 days, making the benchmark an instructive metric to judge a new administration and its priorities. So what do Lai’s first 100 days say about where his administration is going?
According to Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) insiders, Lai and Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) plan to emphasize unity in their speeches this week, characterizing their administration as a team that “does not face the public with individual heroism.” To underline that point, they would divvy up topics, with Lai covering defense and foreign affairs, while Cho addresses domestic policies. The tone corresponds with the tenor of their administration thus far. Lai and Cho are veteran politicians with deep roots in their party, having served in local and central governments for decades. They came into office with a policy-based plan for governance that builds on the previous eight years of the DPP administration. They have acted quickly, announcing many new initiatives in the first 100 days that center on a technocratic structure of government that has defined their careers.
Within a month of taking office on May 20, Lai made a clear declaration of his priorities by announcing the establishment of three ad hoc committees dedicated to addressing climate change, civil defense and healthcare. He vowed to staff them with representatives from across society and preside over each one, with the aim of coordinating across government and the private sector to tackle what he sees are the nation’s three greatest challenges. He lent credence to his “team-building” approach by announcing some surprising choices for the climate committee leadership. Two of them — former Academia Sinica president Lee Yuan-tseh (李遠哲) and Pegatron Group chairman Tung Tzu-hsien (童子賢) — support the use of nuclear power, directly opposing the DPP’s long-standing “nuclear-free homeland” policy. With these choices, Lai is signaling his intent to listen to opposition voices, but on a more practical level, it allows his administration to ease concerns about maintaining a stable power supply while still assuring their base that the party’s stance on nuclear has not changed.
Healthcare has been another major focus. Considering Lai’s background as a physician, it is an initiative that feels genuine to him on a personal level. On Thursday, he presided over the first meeting of the Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee, announcing a goal to raise the life expectancy to 82 over eight years. In the months before, the Cabinet had announced a dizzying array of policies and budgets as part of the greater “Healthy Taiwan” plan that seeks to expand cancer screenings, offer free checkups, and improve remote and long-term healthcare. Lai has clearly consolidated expertise on the subject within his administration and plans to make it a hallmark of his presidency. Yet what he is able to achieve among all his proposals remains to be seen.
Besides healthcare reform, Lai seems to be eyeing artificial intelligence (AI) as another hallmark of his presidency. One of Lai’s most repeated pledges has been to make Taiwan an “AI island.” The Cabinet last week announced a NT$36 billion (US$1.13 billion) investment over five years to transform southern Taiwan into a computational and technological hub. Although it feels like an emptier slogan than “Healthy Taiwan,” Lai hopes to fortify the nation’s dominance in cutting-edge silicon and computers following the lead of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. The administration just needs to be careful to put its funding in the right places, as it is always risky chasing the latest tech trend when so many others are also in the race.
The Lai administration has hit the ground running, hoping to prove to Taiwanese its determination to govern effectively. It should keep up the energy, as these are the benchmarks on which Lai’s presidency will be judged.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS