Today marks President William Lai’s (賴清德) 100th day in office. Most campaigns promise to enact much of their platform within the first 100 days, making the benchmark an instructive metric to judge a new administration and its priorities. So what do Lai’s first 100 days say about where his administration is going?
According to Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) insiders, Lai and Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) plan to emphasize unity in their speeches this week, characterizing their administration as a team that “does not face the public with individual heroism.” To underline that point, they would divvy up topics, with Lai covering defense and foreign affairs, while Cho addresses domestic policies. The tone corresponds with the tenor of their administration thus far. Lai and Cho are veteran politicians with deep roots in their party, having served in local and central governments for decades. They came into office with a policy-based plan for governance that builds on the previous eight years of the DPP administration. They have acted quickly, announcing many new initiatives in the first 100 days that center on a technocratic structure of government that has defined their careers.
Within a month of taking office on May 20, Lai made a clear declaration of his priorities by announcing the establishment of three ad hoc committees dedicated to addressing climate change, civil defense and healthcare. He vowed to staff them with representatives from across society and preside over each one, with the aim of coordinating across government and the private sector to tackle what he sees are the nation’s three greatest challenges. He lent credence to his “team-building” approach by announcing some surprising choices for the climate committee leadership. Two of them — former Academia Sinica president Lee Yuan-tseh (李遠哲) and Pegatron Group chairman Tung Tzu-hsien (童子賢) — support the use of nuclear power, directly opposing the DPP’s long-standing “nuclear-free homeland” policy. With these choices, Lai is signaling his intent to listen to opposition voices, but on a more practical level, it allows his administration to ease concerns about maintaining a stable power supply while still assuring their base that the party’s stance on nuclear has not changed.
Healthcare has been another major focus. Considering Lai’s background as a physician, it is an initiative that feels genuine to him on a personal level. On Thursday, he presided over the first meeting of the Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee, announcing a goal to raise the life expectancy to 82 over eight years. In the months before, the Cabinet had announced a dizzying array of policies and budgets as part of the greater “Healthy Taiwan” plan that seeks to expand cancer screenings, offer free checkups, and improve remote and long-term healthcare. Lai has clearly consolidated expertise on the subject within his administration and plans to make it a hallmark of his presidency. Yet what he is able to achieve among all his proposals remains to be seen.
Besides healthcare reform, Lai seems to be eyeing artificial intelligence (AI) as another hallmark of his presidency. One of Lai’s most repeated pledges has been to make Taiwan an “AI island.” The Cabinet last week announced a NT$36 billion (US$1.13 billion) investment over five years to transform southern Taiwan into a computational and technological hub. Although it feels like an emptier slogan than “Healthy Taiwan,” Lai hopes to fortify the nation’s dominance in cutting-edge silicon and computers following the lead of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. The administration just needs to be careful to put its funding in the right places, as it is always risky chasing the latest tech trend when so many others are also in the race.
The Lai administration has hit the ground running, hoping to prove to Taiwanese its determination to govern effectively. It should keep up the energy, as these are the benchmarks on which Lai’s presidency will be judged.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS