I got my cash gift with my Taipei Senior EasyCard at a convenience store today.
The practice of distributing cash gifts for most senior Taipei residents was suspended by then-Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) for seven years, with only elderly residents from low and lower-middle income households qualifying for the gift. It was later reinstated by Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安).
Still, the cash gift of NT$1,500 has become an object of ridicule among residents of other cities and counties: As privileged residents of the nation’s capital, dubbed the Celestial Dragons (天龍人), this is only what they get.
Many local governments increased social welfare, including allowances for seniors, as part of their election campaign strategy. Some seniors even received subsidies for dentures.
Ko did the very opposite. He reduced three types of allowances for senior residents: healthcare insurance subsidies, free bus rides per month and cash gifts for the Double Ninth Festival. He disqualified those who exceeded the financial limit. It caused a great outcry among the elderly.
A cash gift of NT$1,500 means almost nothing for those as rich as Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), Ko has said. However, as its name suggests, age is the criterion. The gift shows respect for the elderly, regardless of social class.
Many people became rich because of their life-long endeavor to carve a successful career. This does not mean they should be deprived of their rights as senior citizens.
The cash gift demonstrates respect for the elderly, instead of an allowance for middle and low-income households.
I agree with the Social Welfare Department that we should let recipients choose if they want to donate the cash gifts to underprivileged groups.
Offering 60 free bus rides per month can encourage elderly people to go out and exercise, which is good for their health, as some of them rarely do so. As for wealthy senior citizens, they usually go out by taxi. It is of no value for the government to haggle over such a small amount of subsidy.
Providing senior benefits symbolizes a progressive welfare state. Back then when the Taipei City Government proposed a cutback, it was regarded as not age-friendly. Elderly people reacted with fury, because they did not expect the government to cut social welfare and do nothing beneficial for the common good.
Candidates for mayoral posts tend to promise a massive increase in various subsidies, especially for the aged, when they are campaigning. This results in inconsistent social benefits for senior citizens in different municipalities.
The Ministry of the Interior or the Ministry of Health and Welfare should formalize a standardized policy on subsidies for elderly people. It is the only way for the elderly to be treated fairly regardless of where they live.
Wang Hsi-chang is a writer.
Translated by Fion Khan
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS