If a car driver or a motorcycle rider contravenes traffic regulations, they are liable to a fine, or depending on the gravity of the violation, a suspension or cancelation of their license or even a lifetime ban on driving.
If factories, restaurants or companies in general break the law, such as by evading taxes, illegally disposing of hazardous waste or using tainted oil, the authorities can impose penalties depending on the seriousness of the offense. In addition to fines and criminal liability, there are administrative penalties such as suspension of operations, cancelation of license or even permanent closure.
By the same token, if a civil organization commits a grievous offense, the government can order its dissolution.
Article 26 of the Political Party Act (政黨法) states that: “Pursuant to Paragraph 5, Article 5 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution of the Republic of China, if there is cause for a political party to be dissolved, the competent authority shall collect pertinent evidence and petition the Taiwan Constitutional Court for a hearing.”
Paragraph 5, Article 5 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution (憲法增修條文) further states: “A political party shall be considered unconstitutional if its goals or activities endanger the existence of the Republic of China or the nation’s free and democratic constitutional order.”
Existing laws are quite lenient toward the issue of dissolving political parties,which is only applicable when they pose an existential threat to the nation or endanger the free and democratic constitutional order. This is to avoid the malicious restriction of a party’s development due to power struggles between rival parties. However, the original drafters of the law must not have thought that a political party could also be used a tool to make money.
The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) is embroiled in a series of allegations of fabricating accounting reports. If this had happened in a company, it would have been ordered to shut down, whereas the TPP continues to operate as usual. In spite of the almost daily exposure of scandals involving the party, TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is still sitting pretty as party chairman.
TPP Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) — the director of Ko’s presidential campaign — should be held most responsible for the scandals. The TPP has suspended her “party rights” for three years, but it has not expelled her from the party. She continues to be a legislator-at-large of the TPP.
The shenanigans of the TPP, which has touted itself as the “white party” that represents clean politics, have been exposed one by one, showing that the party in essence is no different from a fraud organization. During this legislative term, the “blue” and “white” camps had jointly passed a series of bills to expand the power of the legislature. This has sparked public anger and calls for the recall of opposition legislators. However, the public can only target legislators elected by constituencies; there is absolutely nothing they can do about legislators-at-large, such as Huang.
The Political Party Act must be amended, so that parties that commit serious offenses can be ordered by law to dissolve or to cease operations.
Chen Wen-ching works in environmental services.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS