The appointment of Wellington Koo (顧立雄) as minister of national defense, only the third civilian to hold the role since 2002, shows positive intent from President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration to make significant reforms in the Ministry of Defense, which has long resisted much-needed reforms.
The military has not kept up with the times and is wedded to outdated concepts based on untenable assumptions about modern warfare. The isolated military — an organization which has not been tested or forced to reform for many decades — has failed to learn from other nations facing similar difficult odds to defend themselves, such as Finland, Israel, Lithuania and Estonia.
Left to its own devices, the military has fostered a culture which disincentivizes risk-taking among soldiers, who are also afraid to pass bad information up the chain of command, where senior officers micromanage and training is highly scripted. The result is a top-down military structure unsuited to modern warfare, and a military which is plagued by corruption and charges of spying. This has sapped the morale of personnel and fostered a deep lack of confidence in the military’s ability to keep Taiwanese safe.
It is a sign of the deep disconnect between society and the military. Polling shows that Taiwanese are very willing to defend their nation if attacked — 77 percent, the World Values Survey in 2022 showed — but the military is still struggling to meet its recruitment quotas.
There are many reasons. Many military-aged Taiwanese believe joining the military would be a waste of time, even as part-time reservists, with reports of recruits spending more time sitting through lectures and doing yard work than learning military skills. Moreover, military service does not confer the same social status as in other nations facing similar threats, such as Finland and Estonia.
Nonetheless, the emergence of grassroots civil defense programs, such as the Kuma Academy and the Forward Alliance, shows that when Taiwanese are given a proper outlet to play a role in their nation’s defense, they seize it.
These organizations are based on the theory that integrating civil and national defense into a whole-of-society approach is the best way to enhance national resilience. It is a sign of the ministry’s disconnect that it has resisted the establishment of any such system, despite the clear enthusiasm from civil society and calls for such a system from international experts.
It is highly unlikely that Koo could implement a whole-of-society system, even in the long term. However, such an approach — in which the whole nation plays a role in defense — would be the best route to securing the nation’s safety, as it would confirm to Beijing that a quick victory would be impossible, making a strong contribution to deterrence. It would also make use of the grassroots enthusiasm, especially from young people, to play a role in defending their nation.
In light of this, Lai should seriously consider Forward Alliance founder Enoch Wu’s (吳怡農) call to nationalize his civil defense organization, by formalizing it and providing it with proper state funding, transitioning it into a territorial defense corps similar to local defenses in other nations, such as the Estonian Defense League.
It should be established under the Ministry of the Interior, bypassing the resistant defense ministry. It would also allow Koo to focus on his priority of training and concept reform.
Such a bold reform would show the nation’s allies that Taiwan is serious about its defense and would make use of the as yet untapped enthusiasm from Taiwanese who want to help, but do not trust the defense ministry to put their time to good use.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective
RSS