The appointment of Wellington Koo (顧立雄) as minister of national defense, only the third civilian to hold the role since 2002, shows positive intent from President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration to make significant reforms in the Ministry of Defense, which has long resisted much-needed reforms.
The military has not kept up with the times and is wedded to outdated concepts based on untenable assumptions about modern warfare. The isolated military — an organization which has not been tested or forced to reform for many decades — has failed to learn from other nations facing similar difficult odds to defend themselves, such as Finland, Israel, Lithuania and Estonia.
Left to its own devices, the military has fostered a culture which disincentivizes risk-taking among soldiers, who are also afraid to pass bad information up the chain of command, where senior officers micromanage and training is highly scripted. The result is a top-down military structure unsuited to modern warfare, and a military which is plagued by corruption and charges of spying. This has sapped the morale of personnel and fostered a deep lack of confidence in the military’s ability to keep Taiwanese safe.
It is a sign of the deep disconnect between society and the military. Polling shows that Taiwanese are very willing to defend their nation if attacked — 77 percent, the World Values Survey in 2022 showed — but the military is still struggling to meet its recruitment quotas.
There are many reasons. Many military-aged Taiwanese believe joining the military would be a waste of time, even as part-time reservists, with reports of recruits spending more time sitting through lectures and doing yard work than learning military skills. Moreover, military service does not confer the same social status as in other nations facing similar threats, such as Finland and Estonia.
Nonetheless, the emergence of grassroots civil defense programs, such as the Kuma Academy and the Forward Alliance, shows that when Taiwanese are given a proper outlet to play a role in their nation’s defense, they seize it.
These organizations are based on the theory that integrating civil and national defense into a whole-of-society approach is the best way to enhance national resilience. It is a sign of the ministry’s disconnect that it has resisted the establishment of any such system, despite the clear enthusiasm from civil society and calls for such a system from international experts.
It is highly unlikely that Koo could implement a whole-of-society system, even in the long term. However, such an approach — in which the whole nation plays a role in defense — would be the best route to securing the nation’s safety, as it would confirm to Beijing that a quick victory would be impossible, making a strong contribution to deterrence. It would also make use of the grassroots enthusiasm, especially from young people, to play a role in defending their nation.
In light of this, Lai should seriously consider Forward Alliance founder Enoch Wu’s (吳怡農) call to nationalize his civil defense organization, by formalizing it and providing it with proper state funding, transitioning it into a territorial defense corps similar to local defenses in other nations, such as the Estonian Defense League.
It should be established under the Ministry of the Interior, bypassing the resistant defense ministry. It would also allow Koo to focus on his priority of training and concept reform.
Such a bold reform would show the nation’s allies that Taiwan is serious about its defense and would make use of the as yet untapped enthusiasm from Taiwanese who want to help, but do not trust the defense ministry to put their time to good use.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS