Capital cities do not just happen. They develop slowly over decades, perhaps centuries, before resembling their creator’s dream — if they ever do. Indonesia is discovering such massive endeavors are hard work and prone to delays. Economics has an annoying habit of intruding.
Some of the hype has been deflated from Nusantara, the US$30 billion administrative center that Indonesian President Joko Widodo made one of his signature projects. Erecting the city from scratch in the equatorial forests of Borneo was always going to be arduous. In the past week, authorities made two important concessions: The settlement might not be ready for the first batch of civil servants, and the guest list for national day celebrations had to be scaled back owing to a lack of catering and lodging.
During a visit to the site about 18 months ago, I recognized that the timetable laid out by Jokowi, as the leader is popularly known, would take some doing. There were lots of dirt tracks and trucks, but actual construction was hard to spot. Roads leading to the area from Balikpapan, the nearest urban area, were narrow.
Work has progressed since then, but not as much as hoped. Looming over the project is the approaching end of Jokowi’s second term in October. His successor, Prabowo Subianto, says he is a fan of Nusantara. The challenge is that the capital is not coming cheap and Prabowo has plenty of his own grand plans. Hard choices await.
Jokowi has handed him a budget that is in decent shape. The deficit for next year is projected to be 2.5 percent of GDP, safely within the 3 percent legal limit, the government announced on Friday last week. The outgoing leader is considered to have run a sound fiscal policy during his decade in office. Jokowi has been aided in this task by Indonesian Minister of Finance Sri Mulyani Indrawati, who is highly regarded by foreign investors. The one truly risky move, during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was the central bank’s direct purchase of bonds from the government — a monetization of debt. That was a practice long shunned in polite economic circles. In a more normal environment, such a step might not be so easily forgiven.
Prabowo, a former top general, has bristled at spending restraints and has pledged a major boost to economic growth. He wants an annual increase in GDP of 8 percent; the figure has been closer to 5 percent over the past decade. It is hard to know whether he really believes this is possible or merely an expression of his ambition. Every time Prabowo expresses frustration at Indonesia’s narrow path, aides clean up the mess by expressing fealty to the rules and tamping down market anxiety. His choice of finance minister will be critical.
The president-elect has promised to finish Nusantara, the first stage of which was scheduled for completion this year. Jokowi envisages close to 2 million people living and working there by 2045. How deep is this commitment?
“I’ve told him Nusantara development will take 10, 15, 20 years,” Jokowi told reporters last week. “He said: ‘That’s not fast enough for me — I want four, five, six years.’ It’s up to him.”
Taken at face value, this puts stress on Prabowo’s own agenda, including a US$29 billion pledge of free meals for schoolchildren.
The idea of moving the capital from Jakarta, which is congested and sinking, is a sound one, but a whole new place, a few hours flight away on a very different island? This is not like getting the Acela train service between New York and Washington or the three-hour drive from Sydney to Canberra. I grew up in Canberra and lived in Washington. These settlements take a while to get going, and can never be free of vested interests.
The good news is that a degree of reality is intruding on Nusantara. There should be no rush to the finish. Canberra was selected as the site of Australia’s capital in 1913, but construction was hampered by two world wars and depression. Washington was burned by the British during the war of 1812. Building capital cities from the ground up proceeds in fits and starts.
Far better to take a measured approach than to hasten as Brazil did in the late 1950s with Brasilia. The city was one of the massive projects favored by then-Brazilian president Juscelino Kubitschek. They left a legacy of rapid inflation and high debt; an economic crisis that followed ushered in years of military rule.
That is not what Prabowo, the former son-in-law of disgraced autocrat Suharto, wants on his record. This is government, not a sprint.
Daniel Moss is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian economies. Previously, he was executive editor for economics at Bloomberg News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
RSS