The government late last month abruptly resumed a policy requiring domestic vehicle assemblers to increase their proportion of local auto parts, a policy mainly targeting Chinese imports that has raised concerns about how strictly the measure would be enforced. Since Taiwan’s entry into the WTO in 2002, it had entirely scrapped rules requiring local automakers to use a certain proportion of domestically made parts, as well as gradually slashing tariffs on imported vehicles from 30 percent to 17.5 percent.
To prevent Chinese auto parts from entering Taiwan in a piecemeal fashion, the Ministry of Economic Affairs on July 30 stipulated that local automakers must increase their share of locally made parts to 20 percent during the first year of the policy, rising to 25 percent in the second year and 35 percent in the third year. Those contravening the policy would be barred from importing critical auto parts, including engines, steering devices, axles and chassis. The new rules take effect this month.
While domestically made parts are relatively pricey given inflationary pressure, the ministry said the purpose of the policy is to protect local auto parts manufacturers and avoid the foundation of the nation’s auto industry being undermined by unfair competition from abroad, given that the domestic auto market is relatively small. The measures also came after some legislators voiced concerns that Taipei-based China Motor Corp took advantage of less expensive Chinese parts to assemble MG brand electric vehicles (EVs), hampering market competition. About 95 percent of MG vehicles built in Taiwan use Chinese components, the ministry said. MG, originally a British brand, was acquired by China’s state-owned SAIC Motor Corp in 2005.
As Chinese vehicles are prohibited from being imported into Taiwan, China Motor adopts the so-called complete knock-down approach, in which a vehicle is delivered in parts and assembled at the destination, to circumvent the ban. MG’s electric hatchback, the MG4, entered the market in the middle of June, with an attractive price of NT$990,000, attracting strong local interest. To comply with the government’s new car assembly rules, MG on Friday said it would halt delivery of the MG4 model at the end of this month. The company said it would strive to bolster cooperation with local auto supply chains to satisfy demand. The new rules would also spoil China Motor’s efforts to introduce the G50 Plus, from Maxus, another SAIC subsidiary.
Kuozui Motors Ltd, which assembles Toyota vehicles in Taiwan, said the ministry’s rules would not affect its production, given its long history of using local auto parts. Kuozui is a joint venture between Hotai Motor Co and Toyota Motor Corp.
The ministry defended its new rules to fend off rising competition from Chinese automakers, pointing to similar policies in the US and the EU. The US raised import tariffs on Chinese EVs to 100 percent, as China has subsidized its EV industry, leading to unfair competition, the ministry said. The concern is that a cap on foreign auto parts is considered an old-fashioned method to protect local suppliers and could face complaints that it contravenes free-trade rules. As a developed country, Taiwan should consider carefully its policies to defend local industries from foreign competition.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS