Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is in deep trouble over the handling of his presidential campaign funds and is now facing legal action.
Responding to the case, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation director Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) said that if the controversy adversely affects Ko, it would be also be bad news for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
Why does the development of the KMT depend so much on what happens to Ko at this point?
What is interesting is that neither Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) office nor the KMT itself seems to be overly bothered about whether the particulars of the case in which Ko is accused involves any contraventions of the law.
They also do not seem too concerned about how Ko should account for himself to the public, or clarify what went on or the part he played in the whole sorry affair. Rather, they are only interested in what this means for the KMT and the party’s interests.
Politics concerns the interests of the public. Therefore, how political figures perceive the “rule of law” and how they go about making sure it is protected is very much something the public should scrutinize. The electorate needs to know that it can trust politicians to use their power appropriately. If politicians are solely concerned with the prospects of their cooperation with other parties so that they can maximize the benefits of such alliances and the development of their own party, then it is clear that they would fall short of the public’s expectations.
The TPP has been hemorrhaging support ever since it threw in its lot with the KMT to help pass the controversial legislative reform bills. Now, on top of the falling support with the electorate, the party and its chairman, Ko, have been caught up in this case of unclear accounting of its election expenses. The TPP is bound to lose more support from voters.
By calling for openness and transparency, as well as justice and fairness, Ko had attracted some intellectuals and young voters. Now that even his presidential campaign funds are unclear, how can his supporters believe he is a “clean” politician or believe in his political competence?
As for the KMT, it should not be happy with the case, and should review itself with caution. It should not only think about the impact of the controversy on the future cooperation between the two parties, or how to defeat the Democratic Progressive Party in the next election. A party is regressive if its development depends on another party.
The KMT should seriously review that relationship. In the presidential election, why did its theme of another power transfer fail to win recognition? It should review whether it has won the hearts of the people and whether it has a clear conscience in terms of national identity, the discipline of its party members and the political atmosphere it creates.
Chen Chi-nung is principal of Shuili Junior High School in Nantou County.
Translated by Eddy Chang
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS