Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is in deep trouble over the handling of his presidential campaign funds and is now facing legal action.
Responding to the case, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation director Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) said that if the controversy adversely affects Ko, it would be also be bad news for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
Why does the development of the KMT depend so much on what happens to Ko at this point?
What is interesting is that neither Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) office nor the KMT itself seems to be overly bothered about whether the particulars of the case in which Ko is accused involves any contraventions of the law.
They also do not seem too concerned about how Ko should account for himself to the public, or clarify what went on or the part he played in the whole sorry affair. Rather, they are only interested in what this means for the KMT and the party’s interests.
Politics concerns the interests of the public. Therefore, how political figures perceive the “rule of law” and how they go about making sure it is protected is very much something the public should scrutinize. The electorate needs to know that it can trust politicians to use their power appropriately. If politicians are solely concerned with the prospects of their cooperation with other parties so that they can maximize the benefits of such alliances and the development of their own party, then it is clear that they would fall short of the public’s expectations.
The TPP has been hemorrhaging support ever since it threw in its lot with the KMT to help pass the controversial legislative reform bills. Now, on top of the falling support with the electorate, the party and its chairman, Ko, have been caught up in this case of unclear accounting of its election expenses. The TPP is bound to lose more support from voters.
By calling for openness and transparency, as well as justice and fairness, Ko had attracted some intellectuals and young voters. Now that even his presidential campaign funds are unclear, how can his supporters believe he is a “clean” politician or believe in his political competence?
As for the KMT, it should not be happy with the case, and should review itself with caution. It should not only think about the impact of the controversy on the future cooperation between the two parties, or how to defeat the Democratic Progressive Party in the next election. A party is regressive if its development depends on another party.
The KMT should seriously review that relationship. In the presidential election, why did its theme of another power transfer fail to win recognition? It should review whether it has won the hearts of the people and whether it has a clear conscience in terms of national identity, the discipline of its party members and the political atmosphere it creates.
Chen Chi-nung is principal of Shuili Junior High School in Nantou County.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS