Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is in deep trouble over the handling of his presidential campaign funds and is now facing legal action.
Responding to the case, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation director Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) said that if the controversy adversely affects Ko, it would be also be bad news for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
Why does the development of the KMT depend so much on what happens to Ko at this point?
What is interesting is that neither Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) office nor the KMT itself seems to be overly bothered about whether the particulars of the case in which Ko is accused involves any contraventions of the law.
They also do not seem too concerned about how Ko should account for himself to the public, or clarify what went on or the part he played in the whole sorry affair. Rather, they are only interested in what this means for the KMT and the party’s interests.
Politics concerns the interests of the public. Therefore, how political figures perceive the “rule of law” and how they go about making sure it is protected is very much something the public should scrutinize. The electorate needs to know that it can trust politicians to use their power appropriately. If politicians are solely concerned with the prospects of their cooperation with other parties so that they can maximize the benefits of such alliances and the development of their own party, then it is clear that they would fall short of the public’s expectations.
The TPP has been hemorrhaging support ever since it threw in its lot with the KMT to help pass the controversial legislative reform bills. Now, on top of the falling support with the electorate, the party and its chairman, Ko, have been caught up in this case of unclear accounting of its election expenses. The TPP is bound to lose more support from voters.
By calling for openness and transparency, as well as justice and fairness, Ko had attracted some intellectuals and young voters. Now that even his presidential campaign funds are unclear, how can his supporters believe he is a “clean” politician or believe in his political competence?
As for the KMT, it should not be happy with the case, and should review itself with caution. It should not only think about the impact of the controversy on the future cooperation between the two parties, or how to defeat the Democratic Progressive Party in the next election. A party is regressive if its development depends on another party.
The KMT should seriously review that relationship. In the presidential election, why did its theme of another power transfer fail to win recognition? It should review whether it has won the hearts of the people and whether it has a clear conscience in terms of national identity, the discipline of its party members and the political atmosphere it creates.
Chen Chi-nung is principal of Shuili Junior High School in Nantou County.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS