The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and its chairman and former presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) are embroiled in a series of political donation scandals, and many believe the political ramifications could be significant, threatening the party’s future.
In the past two weeks, analysts questioned the party’s use of political donations it received during the election campaign, based on donation disclosure data published by the Control Yuan.
The data showed that Ko’s campaign office made several questionable payments to marketing companies, including the marketing firm Muko (木可行銷公關). Two marketing companies said they did not receive the three payments totaling NT$9.16 million (US$285,982) that the party declared, while one marketing company said Muko owed it more than NT$13 million for services it delivered. A marketing company was also questioned about how it received three payments totaling NT$10 million for promotional services within three months after it changed its name in May last year.
The TPP apologized for misreporting the three payments adding to NT$9.16 million, but on Monday last week, it found that 17 records were unreported or misreported, bringing the total to NT$18.17 million.
The party said an accountant they hired, surnamed Tuanmu (端木), was at fault for “cutting corners.” Meanwhile, Ko did not apologize, but said he “failed to recognize the persons’ true colors and recruited the wrong people,” blaming Tuanmu, his election campaign manager TPP Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) and chief financial officer Lee Wen-tsung (李文宗). He also tried to downplay the scandals by saying that it was the first time the party ran in a presidential election.
However, it was also revealed that managers and employees of some of the marketing companies, including Muko, were members of Ko’s campaign office, raising more questions about whether the TPP made fraudulent financial declarations.
In other developments, questioned about why a company opened in May by Ko’s son had the same registered address as the TPP’s headquarters, Ko’s wife, Peggy Chen (陳佩琪), said they had opened a company under their son’s name — which is illegal as she is a civil servant — then later said her son opened the company on his own.
Ko is also entangled in scandals regarding two real-estate projects — the Core Pacific City Mall (京華城) redevelopment and the Beitou Shilin Science Park (北投士林科技園區) — conducted when he was Taipei mayor. City councilors have set up two investigative committees and have invited Ko to attend, but so far he has declined the invitation.
Ko has run twice for mayor and the five-year-old TPP has had candidates running in mayoral elections, so pretending to be amateurs is far-fetched.
Article 20 and 21 of the Political Donations Act (政治獻金法) stipulate that the party, candidate or designated persons must keep an account of income and expenditures. The party or candidate should also sign the report, and have it audited and attested by an accountant, so having the accountant “compile” and “audit” the report as the TPP claims seems very questionable.
Moreover, Ko, who for years has touted himself as being “open and transparent,” “uncorrupted and frugal” and someone who maintains “financial discipline,” has harshly criticized the two major political parties for being corrupt and wasting large sums of money during election campaigns, now finds himself being scrutinized by the same principles.
Ko and the TPP have projected the image that they are clean from corruption and the “nontransparent” politics of the two-party system, attracting mostly young people who wish to see a new third force in politics. That image is now being seriously challenged. If the TPP or Ko are unable to clarify their accounts and take responsibility for their “mistakes,” more supporters are likely to lose faith in the party and its chairman, pushing it to the margins and leaving it less of a player in Taiwanese politics.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS