The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and its chairman and former presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) are embroiled in a series of political donation scandals, and many believe the political ramifications could be significant, threatening the party’s future.
In the past two weeks, analysts questioned the party’s use of political donations it received during the election campaign, based on donation disclosure data published by the Control Yuan.
The data showed that Ko’s campaign office made several questionable payments to marketing companies, including the marketing firm Muko (木可行銷公關). Two marketing companies said they did not receive the three payments totaling NT$9.16 million (US$285,982) that the party declared, while one marketing company said Muko owed it more than NT$13 million for services it delivered. A marketing company was also questioned about how it received three payments totaling NT$10 million for promotional services within three months after it changed its name in May last year.
The TPP apologized for misreporting the three payments adding to NT$9.16 million, but on Monday last week, it found that 17 records were unreported or misreported, bringing the total to NT$18.17 million.
The party said an accountant they hired, surnamed Tuanmu (端木), was at fault for “cutting corners.” Meanwhile, Ko did not apologize, but said he “failed to recognize the persons’ true colors and recruited the wrong people,” blaming Tuanmu, his election campaign manager TPP Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) and chief financial officer Lee Wen-tsung (李文宗). He also tried to downplay the scandals by saying that it was the first time the party ran in a presidential election.
However, it was also revealed that managers and employees of some of the marketing companies, including Muko, were members of Ko’s campaign office, raising more questions about whether the TPP made fraudulent financial declarations.
In other developments, questioned about why a company opened in May by Ko’s son had the same registered address as the TPP’s headquarters, Ko’s wife, Peggy Chen (陳佩琪), said they had opened a company under their son’s name — which is illegal as she is a civil servant — then later said her son opened the company on his own.
Ko is also entangled in scandals regarding two real-estate projects — the Core Pacific City Mall (京華城) redevelopment and the Beitou Shilin Science Park (北投士林科技園區) — conducted when he was Taipei mayor. City councilors have set up two investigative committees and have invited Ko to attend, but so far he has declined the invitation.
Ko has run twice for mayor and the five-year-old TPP has had candidates running in mayoral elections, so pretending to be amateurs is far-fetched.
Article 20 and 21 of the Political Donations Act (政治獻金法) stipulate that the party, candidate or designated persons must keep an account of income and expenditures. The party or candidate should also sign the report, and have it audited and attested by an accountant, so having the accountant “compile” and “audit” the report as the TPP claims seems very questionable.
Moreover, Ko, who for years has touted himself as being “open and transparent,” “uncorrupted and frugal” and someone who maintains “financial discipline,” has harshly criticized the two major political parties for being corrupt and wasting large sums of money during election campaigns, now finds himself being scrutinized by the same principles.
Ko and the TPP have projected the image that they are clean from corruption and the “nontransparent” politics of the two-party system, attracting mostly young people who wish to see a new third force in politics. That image is now being seriously challenged. If the TPP or Ko are unable to clarify their accounts and take responsibility for their “mistakes,” more supporters are likely to lose faith in the party and its chairman, pushing it to the margins and leaving it less of a player in Taiwanese politics.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS