Amid China’s escalating military harassment of Taiwan, a teaser released on July 23 of the new TV series Zero Day (零日攻擊), a local production portraying a Chinese attack on Taiwan, attracted more than 1 million views in a week, sparking an emotional response and discussions across the nation.
Partly funded by the government and scheduled to air next year, ‘Zero Day’ depicts a Chinese warplane disappearing in the Taiwan Strait and China using the search as an excuse to mount a naval blockade of Taiwan and launch an invasion. The 17-minute trailer shows clips how Beijing could increase its choke hold on Taiwan in the prelude to war, including sparking a financial crash, cyberattacks disrupting infrastructure, sabotage by Beijing’s collaborators, foreigners fleeing, proliferation of fake news and hacking of mass broadcasting systems, with a Chinese news anchor calling on Taiwanese to accept the “peaceful reunification of the motherland.”
The preview has resonated with people and given them a sense of urgency. “We are finally beginning to see problems that many Taiwanese dare not face,” one viewer said, while another said: “It is heavy, because it is possible.”
The trailer has also provoked anxiety and criticism from pro-China politicians and groups, with Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers calling the TV show government propaganda to amplify China’s military threats. In this, they are echoing China’s state media, which has accused Taipei of “spreading fear” and has censored all references to Zero Day on social media.
Ironically, the KMT — like the Chinese Communist Party — is an expert on spreading propaganda, honed by decades of governance during the Martial Law period. The public was then forced to watch movies and TV programs produced by state-funded companies to promote patriotism and fight the “evil” Chinese communists. However, the party has since turned its back on those values, and now parrots Being’s call for “peaceful reunification” and avoiding war with the authoritarian regime across the Strait.
Taiwan, especially under the Democratic Progressive Party administration, has long faced difficulties in increasing public awareness about the Chinese threat. While it hopes to raise a sense of alarm to encourage the public to support national defense efforts, it does not want people to end up feeling hopeless about the inevitability of war or defeat.
Zero Day was one of the proposals the Ministry of Culture received for its program on promoting local cultural productions. It received the lowest subsidy among the approved projects and was the only one that dared to touch on the sensitive topic of war that most Taiwanese avoid, virtually guaranteeing that it would be banned in the Chinese market.
“In Taiwan, people think about it [war] all the time, but hardly ever talk about it,” series director Lo Ging-zim (羅景壬) said in an interview. “However, if we do not make that fear tangible, we are going to have a hard time getting people to talk about it.”
Lo added that he hoped the series would create a sense of urgency among the public who have become desensitized to the Chinese threat after decades of facing such pressure.
The government has in recent years drastically increased the national defense budget. President William Lai (賴清德) has pledged to further spend a record NT$647 billion (US$20.03 billion) next year, up 6 percent year-on-year, showing the government’s commitment to enhancing national defense. However, the bigger challenge remains raising public awareness about the Chinese threat and the greater danger of its infiltration of Taiwanese democracy.
To avoid a war, people must know the enemy and be prepared. Zero Day has ignited a spark illuminating tensions across the Strait. We need to strengthen collective vigilance and our determination to defend our country.
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
RSS