Thu, Aug 08, 2024 page8

• Nothing wrong with ‘Taiwanese’

  • By Lau Seng-hian 劉承賢
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Aurelijus Vijunas’ recent opinion article “An accurate term for ‘Taiwanese’” (Aug. 3, page 8) argues that ‘Taiwanese’ (the common name for Hoklo) is not a suitable name for the Southern Min variety spoken in Taiwan. He presents three main points: Taiwanese is mutually intelligible with some Southern Min varieties, especially in China; the name was coined by Japanese officials without linguistic basis; and Taiwan is a multilingual and multicultural society.

  Vijunas’ arguments are flawed based on global language naming.

  First, he conflates language naming with linguistic classification. While Taiwanese is a Southern Min variety, many languages are named independently of their typological classification. For instance, English, a Germanic language, is not called Anglo-Saxon or British Germanic. Similarly, Icelandic, an Old Norse language, is not called Icelandic Norse or Icelandic Scandinavian.

  Mutual intelligibility is also not a decisive factor in language naming. Norwegians can talk to Danish speakers without any difficulties, says A.E. Blomso, a student of mine whose family is from Norway. Does this mean Norwegian and Danish are not two distinct languages?

  Languages which are mutually intelligible, but named differently, are not rare. Examples include Indonesian and Malay, Hindi and Urdu, and Croatian and Serbian.

  Second, Vijunas incorrectly attributes the coinage of ‘Taiwanese’ to Japanese officials. Historian Ang Ka-im (翁佳音) found the terms in Dutch and Qing Dynasty documents, predating Japanese rule. Taiwanese emerged as a lingua franca among Taiwan’s diverse population. That challenges the notion that a language’s name must reflect a single ethnic group or a purely linguistic basis. Numerous countries, including the UK, Japan, South Korea, Vietnam and Italy, are multilingual and multicultural, yet their primary languages are named after their respective countries.

  Hakka and indigenous languages are undeniably important, but Taiwanese serves as the representative language of Taiwanese culture, arts, history and place names.

  In an English-language interview with CommonWealth Magazine published in December last year, German journalist Leonardo Pape said: “Before coming to Taiwan, my biggest impression of Taiwan was its music. I liked Wu Bai (伍佰) for a very long time. I had heard Yeh Chi-tien’s (葉啟田) song Ai Pan Jiu Hui Ying (愛拼才會贏, Life Will Win If You Fight) in China before. My regret in Taiwan is that I didn’t make more effort to learn Taiwanese. Language is a key to culture, and if I truly wanted to become Taiwanese, learning Taiwanese should have been important.”

  As Pape observed, Taiwanese is key to understanding Taiwan’s culture. In contrast, Mandarin was imposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and is not inherently connected to Taiwanese identity.

  The name “Taiwanese” aligns with global language-naming practices. It organically developed as a lingua franca among Taiwan’s people and reflects the language’s cultural significance. As linguists, we should respect a community’s right to name its language, recognizing that such naming is a fundamental aspect of human rights.

  Lau Seng-hian is an associate professor at National Taiwan Normal University.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    First person arrested as Danjiang Bridge opens

  • 2

    TSMC shares stumble on report, but losses minor

  • 3

    Navy needs 12 subs for modern fleet: CSBC head

  • 4

    Snake on a train spooks riders on Taipei MRT line

  • 5

    HIMARS to be deployed to islands