Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) on Sunday delivered a speech in Bangkok discussing cross-strait tensions and his recommendations for promoting peace between Taiwan and China. He said little new, reiterating the need to “trust” Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and to concentrate on negotiations with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). He repeated his appraisal that Taiwan could not win in a war against the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), nor could it rely on military intervention by the US.
Some would ask why people need to listen to what Ma thinks, a washed-up politician, out of power for the best part of a decade. Nevertheless, he still wields considerable influence within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and his words and actions affect the international perception of Taiwan. Moreover, many Taiwanese agree with him.
Much of the reporting and response to Ma’s speech focused on what he said about Taiwan’s military budget and “money pit” bills, but that was not the most noteworthy aspect of his speech. On the surface, the main thrust of his address was eminently reasonable. He is right that nobody wants to see tensions escalate into war, and that talks and diplomacy are preferable to military action. Nothing he said was a departure from his consistent stance on China during his presidency and in the eight years since. It was also consistent with his ideological position on the concept of “one China” and his loyalty to the Republic of China and its Constitution, as a representative of the KMT.
His attitude toward the CCP in general and to Xi in particular is certainly a major departure from the KMT’s previous stance, but it would be lazy to criticize him on that point alone. Circumstances change, cross-strait dynamics are not what they were four decades ago and the threat from the PLA is vastly more serious.
What cannot be ignored are his myopic appraisal of Xi and the omission of what Taiwanese want. Ma met Xi in Beijing in April. He said he found the Chinese leader to be “extremely gentle and amiable,” that Xi hoped more Taiwanese would visit China and that Chinese should visit Taiwan, to promote mutual understanding and trust. Ma said he believed that this was an expression of Xi’s goodwill and sincerity toward Taiwanese, and that as long as people on either side of the Taiwan Strait identify as being ethnically Chinese, then anything can be open to negotiation.
The picture Ma painted of Xi in his Bangkok speech was that of a perfectly reasonable, avuncular individual. He paints President William Lai (賴清德) as an obstinate impediment to a path to peace.
Ma’s omissions of the fundamental realities of the CCP’s constant threats of war are so glaring that they are not worth addressing here. Of interest is that a former president can speak so glowingly of the man who threatens to rain down fire and brimstone on Taiwan, and who would so willingly allow negotiations on the future of Taiwanese to be orchestrated by a foreign power.
On this page, Paraguayan Ambassador to the Republic of China Carlos Jose Fleitas Rodriguez writes about a statement by Paraguayan President Santiago Pena that his country recognizes Taiwan’s right to self-determination as a nation, as enshrined in the International Covenants on Human Rights and justified by possession of the four criteria for statehood as set out in the 1933 Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States. If the president of a diplomatic ally can say that, why can a former president of Taiwan not say it?
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS