As the world’s nations sailed the River Seine during the opening ceremony for the Olympics last month, Taiwan once again suffered the enduring humiliation of being the sole country forced to sail under a fictitious name and flag.
“Chinese Taipei” is not merely a fake place, but part of a strategic campaign by China to conquer Taiwan in the minds of the global public, forcing the international community to accept the fiction that China has authority over Taiwan, as I have written before in the Taipei Times (“Taiwan’s ‘Chinese Taipei’ problem,” May 22, page 8).
If Taiwanese wish to be seen as Taiwan, they must fight back and contest this blatant discrimination and cognitive warfare. While overt protests might be disrupted pre-emptively by the corrupt International Olympic Committee (IOC), other national teams have captured global attention with subtle and profound acts of protest.
In an inspiring anti-colonial protest, the Algerian team cast roses into the Seine under a bridge where French police threw hundreds of innocent Algerians to their deaths six decades ago. Palestine’s flagbearer drew attention for a shirt embroidered with outlines of bombs dropping onto children playing soccer, and a member of the Hong Kong delegation strategically raised his arm to block the “China,” appended to Hong Kong’s banner.
Many small nations have taken the opportunity on the world’s stage to raise their national profile. Mongolia enthralled the world this year with its viral uniforms blending traditional dress with modern uniforms, and who can forget Pita Taufatofua, the oiled up shirtless flagbearer who put Tonga on the map for the entire world?
Taiwan’s own rich history and diverse cultural influences include fashion and traditions with roots in Mongolia and Polynesia, yet it has failed to unleash the same fire as its fraternal Asian and Pacific Island nations.
As Taiwan cinched its first gold on Sunday, badminton duo Lee Yang (李洋) and Wang Chi-lin (王齊麟) were forced to stand under a fake flag for the medal ceremony, even as the flag of the losing Chinese team was hoisted for the silver medal. Lee and Wang’s repeat gold is the pinnacle of athletic achievement, and rightly deserves celebration, but without the indignity of erasing their national identity.
What could memorialize their achievement more in the annals of history than a brilliant act of protest, reclaiming their dignity as Taiwanese? One of the most memorable Olympic moments of all time was the 1968 “black power protest” by Tommie Smith and John Carlos, a political statement remembered long beyond their athletic achievements.
Palestinian swimmers have caught eyeballs for temporary body tattoos — although Taiwanese athletes would likely be unable to compete with visible flag tattoos. What is stopping any athlete from discretely tattooing a flag or political slogan, and removing their shirt to display it during the medal ceremony?
“Chinese Taipei” has not remained confined to the Olympics. “Chinese Taipei creep” has led to the widespread adoption of the term in numerous contexts to refer to Taiwan, leading to the false impression that it is a real place or identity.
While international media have increasingly referred to the team as “Taiwan,” most sportscasters continue to use the false “Chinese Taipei” term. Most reporting has repeated the Chinese lie that the term is a compromise accepted by both sides. This is simply untrue; the colonial term was forced on the Taiwanese during the Martial Law period by the authoritarian Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
Unwilling to accept further national humiliation, several Taiwanese spectators in Paris have proudly displayed signs supporting Taiwan, including a young woman with a poster in the shape of Taiwan, who was subsequently assaulted by a Chinese spectator, and a man with a towel simply reading “Taiwan,” who was similarly assaulted by the IOC’s corrupt officials.
A notice prohibiting the Republic of China (ROC) national flag in Olympic venues, along with those of Russia and Belarus, has gone viral on social media. While some Taiwanese condemn the ROC flag for the human rights violations they endured under this flag, it is plainly wrong in the present day to associate the flag of the peaceful nation of Taiwan with those of Russia and Belarus, which are committing war crimes in Ukraine.
Despite these protests summoning international attention toward the issue, international media remain woefully misinformed. CNN’s account of the protesters falsely claims that Taiwan competed as the ROC until the 1970s, ignoring the years when Taiwan participated as “Taiwan” and “Formosa.” The Taiwanese diaspora and advocacy groups have shirked the opportunity to utilize racial justice frameworks to hold their media to account for such discriminatory portrayals.
Of course, in those years the authoritarian ROC government understood the importance of winning international visibility, and sent its delegation to Rome in 1960 with a banner proclaiming “Under Protest.”
One week remains of the Paris games, yet it remains to be seen if Taiwan will stand up and make its voice heard.
Sasha B. Chhabra is an analyst, commentator and media consultant on China’s foreign policy, Taiwanese politics and cross-strait affairs.
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
RSS