Pegatron Corp CEO Tung Tzu-hsien (童子賢) has been expending a lot of energy pushing nuclear power as a way to reduce carbon emissions, as well as a “golden ratio” in which 30 percent of Taiwan’s energy would come from renewable sources, 30 percent from nuclear power and 40 percent from fire-powered plants.
This is a stark difference from the government’s zero carbon road map, which calls for an energy ratio of 60 to 70 percent renewables, 20 to 30 percent natural gas paired with carbon capture and 9 to 12 percent hydrogen-fired plants.
Tung pointed to the nuclear policies of Italy and Finland as examples to prop up his argument that nuclear and green energy can exist together.
However, the international situation for nuclear and renewable development trends is anything but that.
DEVELOPED NATIONS
First, only 30 countries use nuclear energy. Most countries do not.
The degree of economic development of many of these non-nuclear countries is on a par with or better than Taiwan’s.
Examples include Germany, Singapore and Israel.
In 2022, with energy prices skyrocketing in Europe following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Germany was forced to extend the service life of its last three nuclear power plants by several months.
Nevertheless, on April 15 last year, it still deactivated them.
Even with the German public demanding that the power plants continue to be used, the government said unequivocally that its non-nuclear power policy was here to stay.
CHINA
Second, most of the world’s nuclear reactors built in the past 20 years are in China, which had 55 nuclear power plants as of February last year.
Excluding China, there has been a global net decrease of 55 reactors.
However, even including China, the increase in renewable power facilities is still faster than that of nuclear plants.
TREND
Most importantly, at the 28th session of the Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, at the end of last year, despite a minority of countries advocating for using nuclear power to reduce carbon emissions, the consensus for carbon reduction activities was ultimately that the volume of renewable energy facilities around the globe before 2030 must be three times the current level, and the yearly efficiency rate for global renewable efficiency must be increased to twice the current level.
Thus, Taiwan must develop renewables and increase energy efficiency, and deactivate the No. 2 reactor of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant next to Pingtung County’s Ma-anshan (馬鞍山) on May 17 next year, as scheduled.
Doing so would allow Taiwan to advance and become a “nuclear-free homeland.”
Further developing nuclear power would run counter to ideals of global justice and threaten Taiwan’s sustainable development.
Development of renewables and economized resources is the way of the future.
Taiwan should work hard toward this goal. It must not let the advocacy for nuclear power restoration hinder the development of renewable energy sources, which would harm the nation’s fight against global warming and progress in transitioning to renewables.
Lin Ren-bin is an academic committee member of the Taiwan Environmental Protection Union.
Translated by Tim Smith
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
RSS