Pegatron Corp CEO Tung Tzu-hsien (童子賢) has been expending a lot of energy pushing nuclear power as a way to reduce carbon emissions, as well as a “golden ratio” in which 30 percent of Taiwan’s energy would come from renewable sources, 30 percent from nuclear power and 40 percent from fire-powered plants.
This is a stark difference from the government’s zero carbon road map, which calls for an energy ratio of 60 to 70 percent renewables, 20 to 30 percent natural gas paired with carbon capture and 9 to 12 percent hydrogen-fired plants.
Tung pointed to the nuclear policies of Italy and Finland as examples to prop up his argument that nuclear and green energy can exist together.
However, the international situation for nuclear and renewable development trends is anything but that.
DEVELOPED NATIONS
First, only 30 countries use nuclear energy. Most countries do not.
The degree of economic development of many of these non-nuclear countries is on a par with or better than Taiwan’s.
Examples include Germany, Singapore and Israel.
In 2022, with energy prices skyrocketing in Europe following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Germany was forced to extend the service life of its last three nuclear power plants by several months.
Nevertheless, on April 15 last year, it still deactivated them.
Even with the German public demanding that the power plants continue to be used, the government said unequivocally that its non-nuclear power policy was here to stay.
CHINA
Second, most of the world’s nuclear reactors built in the past 20 years are in China, which had 55 nuclear power plants as of February last year.
Excluding China, there has been a global net decrease of 55 reactors.
However, even including China, the increase in renewable power facilities is still faster than that of nuclear plants.
TREND
Most importantly, at the 28th session of the Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, at the end of last year, despite a minority of countries advocating for using nuclear power to reduce carbon emissions, the consensus for carbon reduction activities was ultimately that the volume of renewable energy facilities around the globe before 2030 must be three times the current level, and the yearly efficiency rate for global renewable efficiency must be increased to twice the current level.
Thus, Taiwan must develop renewables and increase energy efficiency, and deactivate the No. 2 reactor of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant next to Pingtung County’s Ma-anshan (馬鞍山) on May 17 next year, as scheduled.
Doing so would allow Taiwan to advance and become a “nuclear-free homeland.”
Further developing nuclear power would run counter to ideals of global justice and threaten Taiwan’s sustainable development.
Development of renewables and economized resources is the way of the future.
Taiwan should work hard toward this goal. It must not let the advocacy for nuclear power restoration hinder the development of renewable energy sources, which would harm the nation’s fight against global warming and progress in transitioning to renewables.
Lin Ren-bin is an academic committee member of the Taiwan Environmental Protection Union.
Translated by Tim Smith
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS