Pegatron Corp CEO Tung Tzu-hsien (童子賢) has been expending a lot of energy pushing nuclear power as a way to reduce carbon emissions, as well as a “golden ratio” in which 30 percent of Taiwan’s energy would come from renewable sources, 30 percent from nuclear power and 40 percent from fire-powered plants.
This is a stark difference from the government’s zero carbon road map, which calls for an energy ratio of 60 to 70 percent renewables, 20 to 30 percent natural gas paired with carbon capture and 9 to 12 percent hydrogen-fired plants.
Tung pointed to the nuclear policies of Italy and Finland as examples to prop up his argument that nuclear and green energy can exist together.
However, the international situation for nuclear and renewable development trends is anything but that.
DEVELOPED NATIONS
First, only 30 countries use nuclear energy. Most countries do not.
The degree of economic development of many of these non-nuclear countries is on a par with or better than Taiwan’s.
Examples include Germany, Singapore and Israel.
In 2022, with energy prices skyrocketing in Europe following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Germany was forced to extend the service life of its last three nuclear power plants by several months.
Nevertheless, on April 15 last year, it still deactivated them.
Even with the German public demanding that the power plants continue to be used, the government said unequivocally that its non-nuclear power policy was here to stay.
CHINA
Second, most of the world’s nuclear reactors built in the past 20 years are in China, which had 55 nuclear power plants as of February last year.
Excluding China, there has been a global net decrease of 55 reactors.
However, even including China, the increase in renewable power facilities is still faster than that of nuclear plants.
TREND
Most importantly, at the 28th session of the Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, at the end of last year, despite a minority of countries advocating for using nuclear power to reduce carbon emissions, the consensus for carbon reduction activities was ultimately that the volume of renewable energy facilities around the globe before 2030 must be three times the current level, and the yearly efficiency rate for global renewable efficiency must be increased to twice the current level.
Thus, Taiwan must develop renewables and increase energy efficiency, and deactivate the No. 2 reactor of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant next to Pingtung County’s Ma-anshan (馬鞍山) on May 17 next year, as scheduled.
Doing so would allow Taiwan to advance and become a “nuclear-free homeland.”
Further developing nuclear power would run counter to ideals of global justice and threaten Taiwan’s sustainable development.
Development of renewables and economized resources is the way of the future.
Taiwan should work hard toward this goal. It must not let the advocacy for nuclear power restoration hinder the development of renewable energy sources, which would harm the nation’s fight against global warming and progress in transitioning to renewables.
Lin Ren-bin is an academic committee member of the Taiwan Environmental Protection Union.
Translated by Tim Smith
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
RSS