A global outage affecting computers running Windows operating systems earlier this month took airlines around the world by surprise, leading to air traffic chaos, while other transportation systems, financial companies, and hospitals and clinics, as well as government departments worldwide were also affected.
In Taiwan, not even the nation’s largest hospital system — National Taiwan University Hospital — was spared.
As the saying goes: “Never let a good crisis go to waste.” With this incident over, what lessons can be learned?
First, critical infrastructure is by no means limited to hardware. With ever-increasing digitization and automation of equipment and infrastructure, software is playing a far more important role. Peacetime has made people more complacent and less aware of these changes.
When departments in governments and private entities are busy compiling management inventories for their critical infrastructure, they cannot let such foundational software as operations systems slip through the cracks. At the same time, software crashes absolutely must be included in emergency response training to address problematic software, hardware or computer system breakdowns.
Second, no matter how technologically advanced or how great the level of digitization and automation is, governments and private enterprises must keep backups to be able to maintain the basic functional equipment society needs. Governments and companies need to integrate resilience into their mindset.
Last, Taiwan’s long-term development has tended to favor hardware production, but has somewhat neglected the software side of computers. As a result, the nation has put too high a degree of trust and reliance on Microsoft products and those of other major international manufacturers. Should another system outage occur, all the nation would be able to do is wait for the original manufacturer to implement a solution or fix. The nation cannot have a repeat of this problem when using generative artificial intelligence.
Huang Wei-ping works in public service and has a master’s degree from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University in the US.
Translated by Tim Smith
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS