India is not the world’s healthiest country. Sadly, regulators seem determined to make the problem worse with each passing year.
Urban Indians, especially wealthier ones, have a relatively sedentary lifestyle and their diet is heavy in carbohydrates and fats. This might not show up easily in the numbers, given the size of the country’s population.
About 23 percent of Indians were technically overweight, which is defined as a body mass index (BMI) over 25, an analysis by The Lancet recently found. Many parts of the world, such as West Asia and Eastern Europe, do much worse.
However, when you break the data down, worrying trends emerge. Women over 30, for instance, have startlingly high rates of abdominal obesity in India — with a prevalence of more than 55 percent for women older than 40. That is a more dangerous indicator of predisposition to metabolic disease than regular BMI.
Moreover, genetics seem to make Indians particularly vulnerable to such ailments.
One scientist at generic pharmaceutical company Lupin Ltd said that Indians tend to have greater insulin resistance and develop type II diabetes at a younger age than the average.
The Lancet suggests that more than 100 million Indians have diabetes and 136 million are pre-diabetic. That is a crisis — one that is set to grow worse as India becomes richer and more urban.
The problem is usually blamed on a change in the diets of middle-class Indians, from fresh to processed foods. The assumption is that packaged products are unhealthier. It is right there in the name: “junk food.”
I am a tiny bit skeptical. I am addicted to Delhi’s deep-fried street food, and I am not so sure it is better for me than anything I could buy in a supermarket.
At the same time, there is data suggesting junk food in India is worse than in many other countries, with higher levels of salt, sugar and saturated fats. More importantly, packaged food can be regulated, so people at least know what they are eating. Ideally, that would allow consumers to better manage their intake of fat and salt.
There remains a lot of room for this transition in India.
Branded food makes up only one-third of the Indian market, but would expand at a compound annual growth rate above 12 percent in coming years, Nestle India Ltd said.
The question is whether regulators are up to the task. They recently announced that nutritional information about sugar, salt and saturated fat would henceforth be displayed “in bold letters and relatively increased font size on labels of packaged food items.” The news was generally welcomed.
In fact, it represented a significant climbdown. The new rules specify that this information would be estimated based on (arbitrary) serving sizes, and as a percentage of recommended daily intake. Translating this into “good” or “bad” requires a level of mental math that the average shopper likely would not want to endure.
The regulations replace a draft plan that would have imposed fewer requirements on shoppers, but was still flawed. In 2022, officials proposed a “star” rating, similar to the ones used to indicate if an appliance is energy-efficient.
As scientists said, that merely “helps the consumer choose the least unhealthy option among a host of unhealthy options.”
Critics worry that India’s food regulators respond more readily to big food companies than to doctors.
The last time they backtracked on warning labels, they placated angry consumers by telling them a new adviser would study the issue — a man whom the New York Times described as leading an institution “almost entirely funded by the Goliaths of the agribusiness, food and pharmaceutical industries.”
The processed food industry is shooting itself in the foot. If companies want Indians to make the switch from mouth-watering street food, they ought to welcome greater transparency, so consumers can be certain they are choosing healthier alternatives.
Better models are available even in India’s neighborhood. In Sri Lanka, for example, sodas are labeled with a “traffic light” system that goes from green (healthy) to red (godawful levels of sugar). Recent research has shown that the system consistently steers consumers towards healthier choices.
Indians need simple, easy-to-understand and prominent warning labels, so that their better natures are given a chance to overtake their impulses. Otherwise, their richer country would only be an unhealthier one.
Mihir Sharma is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. A senior fellow at the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi, he is author of Restart: The Last Chance for the Indian Economy.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS