China officially avoided commenting on US Vice President Kamala Harris’ late entry into the US presidential race. However, Chinese state-backed news outlets and social media users cast her as a weak vice president whose candidacy did not present a major threat to the world’s No. 2 economy.
The Global Times, a Chinese Communist Party-backed media outlet, cited Chinese experts who called Harris’ performance in the White House “mediocre” and claimed she lacked the “experience and achievements to serve as president.”
Another Chinese state-run outlet highlighted former US president Donald Trump’s campaign trail claim Harris would be “easier to beat” than the sitting president.
“Does this mean Trump is set to win?” one person asked on a Chinese microblogging site, where the “Biden exit” hashtag garnered about 490 million views as users tried to parse what the shift meant for the Asian nation.
An online poll of 12,000 users of that platform found about 80 percent believed the Republicans would now prevail in the November vote, without portraying that as a negative outcome.
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Mao Ning (毛寧) on Monday sidestepped a question about US President Joe Biden’s decision to withdraw from the race and endorse his running mate, calling it a “domestic affair.”
“We will not comment on that,” she said at a regular briefing in Beijing.
Most analysts agreed Harris would, at least initially, bring continuity on trade and foreign policy, meaning little impact for Beijing on the switch-up in the likely Democratic candidate.
“There is a well-established strategic continuity that is driving the US position right now,” said Josef Gregory Mahoney, a professor of international relations at Shanghai’s East China Normal University.
“And at the level of whether it’s Biden or Trump or Harris, it’s really just a matter of style,” Mahoney said.
Fundamentally, the next president has to represent the economic and strategic interests of the US, he added.
Tensions between the world’s largest economies have flared in recent years over China’s military aggression toward Taiwan and Washington’s campaign to cut Beijing off from high-tech chips. While Biden used a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in San Francisco last year to steady ties, fresh US complaints about a surge in cheap Chinese exports are adding friction to the relationship.
Harris has only met Xi on the sidelines of a summit in Thailand and has not visited Beijing in her current role. While Biden is set to be the first US president since Jimmy Carter not to travel to China while in office — a point noted on X by former Global Times editor-in-chief Hu Xijin (胡錫進). Despite that, Biden has repeatedly touted spending “more time” with Xi than any other world leader at “about 90 hours.”
Harris, a former prosecutor, would need to quickly build trust with national security advisers to guide her on China policy, said Drew Thompson, a senior fellow at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy in Singapore.
“Harris does not have a track record on China, and it is not an area she is particularly comfortable,” added the former Pentagon official. “Biden has keen instincts and long-standing relationships with world leaders including Xi Jinping, but Harris does not.”
One asset she could leverage is California Governor Gavin Newsom, whose trip to China last year won praise inside the Asian nation for bringing a more constructive message of cooperation than visits from other Biden administration officials.
While Chinese citizens touted Newsom as a Biden replacement after the US president’s bad debate performance, the Californian has backed Harris for the ticket.
“Tough. Fearless. Tenacious,” he wrote of her on his official X page. “No one is better to prosecute the case against Donald Trump’s dark vision.”
Newsom in a senior Cabinet role could help Harris harness the rapport he has established with Chinese leaders. Both Democrats built their careers in California, the only US state to send a governor to Beijing for a meeting with Xi during Biden’s term and one with strong business ties to the Asian nation.
Harris’ public comments display a willingness to uphold the current administration’s tough stance on trade, which has seen Biden build on tariffs imposed by Trump. Those curbs have been justified as necessary for protecting both national security and US jobs.
Following a summit of Southeast Asian countries in Indonesia last year, Harris said there was a need to protect US interests and ensure “we are a leader in terms of the rules of the road, as opposed to following others’ rules.”
During that event, she slammed Beijing for “bullying,” citing its attempts at controlling access to the South China Sea, where China has sweeping claims of sovereignty.
Harris also visited Palawan, the Philippines, an island close to an area that is in heavy dispute between China and neighboring countries.
Harris’ foreign policy overall is expected to align with Biden’s, especially regarding China, said Zhu Junwei, a former researcher in the People’s Liberation Army who is now director of American research at Grandview Institution.
“The two parties don’t have much difference on China,” she said of Republicans and Democrats. “On China they’re quite the same.”
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS