China officially avoided commenting on US Vice President Kamala Harris’ late entry into the US presidential race. However, Chinese state-backed news outlets and social media users cast her as a weak vice president whose candidacy did not present a major threat to the world’s No. 2 economy.
The Global Times, a Chinese Communist Party-backed media outlet, cited Chinese experts who called Harris’ performance in the White House “mediocre” and claimed she lacked the “experience and achievements to serve as president.”
Another Chinese state-run outlet highlighted former US president Donald Trump’s campaign trail claim Harris would be “easier to beat” than the sitting president.
“Does this mean Trump is set to win?” one person asked on a Chinese microblogging site, where the “Biden exit” hashtag garnered about 490 million views as users tried to parse what the shift meant for the Asian nation.
An online poll of 12,000 users of that platform found about 80 percent believed the Republicans would now prevail in the November vote, without portraying that as a negative outcome.
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Mao Ning (毛寧) on Monday sidestepped a question about US President Joe Biden’s decision to withdraw from the race and endorse his running mate, calling it a “domestic affair.”
“We will not comment on that,” she said at a regular briefing in Beijing.
Most analysts agreed Harris would, at least initially, bring continuity on trade and foreign policy, meaning little impact for Beijing on the switch-up in the likely Democratic candidate.
“There is a well-established strategic continuity that is driving the US position right now,” said Josef Gregory Mahoney, a professor of international relations at Shanghai’s East China Normal University.
“And at the level of whether it’s Biden or Trump or Harris, it’s really just a matter of style,” Mahoney said.
Fundamentally, the next president has to represent the economic and strategic interests of the US, he added.
Tensions between the world’s largest economies have flared in recent years over China’s military aggression toward Taiwan and Washington’s campaign to cut Beijing off from high-tech chips. While Biden used a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in San Francisco last year to steady ties, fresh US complaints about a surge in cheap Chinese exports are adding friction to the relationship.
Harris has only met Xi on the sidelines of a summit in Thailand and has not visited Beijing in her current role. While Biden is set to be the first US president since Jimmy Carter not to travel to China while in office — a point noted on X by former Global Times editor-in-chief Hu Xijin (胡錫進). Despite that, Biden has repeatedly touted spending “more time” with Xi than any other world leader at “about 90 hours.”
Harris, a former prosecutor, would need to quickly build trust with national security advisers to guide her on China policy, said Drew Thompson, a senior fellow at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy in Singapore.
“Harris does not have a track record on China, and it is not an area she is particularly comfortable,” added the former Pentagon official. “Biden has keen instincts and long-standing relationships with world leaders including Xi Jinping, but Harris does not.”
One asset she could leverage is California Governor Gavin Newsom, whose trip to China last year won praise inside the Asian nation for bringing a more constructive message of cooperation than visits from other Biden administration officials.
While Chinese citizens touted Newsom as a Biden replacement after the US president’s bad debate performance, the Californian has backed Harris for the ticket.
“Tough. Fearless. Tenacious,” he wrote of her on his official X page. “No one is better to prosecute the case against Donald Trump’s dark vision.”
Newsom in a senior Cabinet role could help Harris harness the rapport he has established with Chinese leaders. Both Democrats built their careers in California, the only US state to send a governor to Beijing for a meeting with Xi during Biden’s term and one with strong business ties to the Asian nation.
Harris’ public comments display a willingness to uphold the current administration’s tough stance on trade, which has seen Biden build on tariffs imposed by Trump. Those curbs have been justified as necessary for protecting both national security and US jobs.
Following a summit of Southeast Asian countries in Indonesia last year, Harris said there was a need to protect US interests and ensure “we are a leader in terms of the rules of the road, as opposed to following others’ rules.”
During that event, she slammed Beijing for “bullying,” citing its attempts at controlling access to the South China Sea, where China has sweeping claims of sovereignty.
Harris also visited Palawan, the Philippines, an island close to an area that is in heavy dispute between China and neighboring countries.
Harris’ foreign policy overall is expected to align with Biden’s, especially regarding China, said Zhu Junwei, a former researcher in the People’s Liberation Army who is now director of American research at Grandview Institution.
“The two parties don’t have much difference on China,” she said of Republicans and Democrats. “On China they’re quite the same.”
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS