China officially avoided commenting on US Vice President Kamala Harris’ late entry into the US presidential race. However, Chinese state-backed news outlets and social media users cast her as a weak vice president whose candidacy did not present a major threat to the world’s No. 2 economy.
The Global Times, a Chinese Communist Party-backed media outlet, cited Chinese experts who called Harris’ performance in the White House “mediocre” and claimed she lacked the “experience and achievements to serve as president.”
Another Chinese state-run outlet highlighted former US president Donald Trump’s campaign trail claim Harris would be “easier to beat” than the sitting president.
“Does this mean Trump is set to win?” one person asked on a Chinese microblogging site, where the “Biden exit” hashtag garnered about 490 million views as users tried to parse what the shift meant for the Asian nation.
An online poll of 12,000 users of that platform found about 80 percent believed the Republicans would now prevail in the November vote, without portraying that as a negative outcome.
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Mao Ning (毛寧) on Monday sidestepped a question about US President Joe Biden’s decision to withdraw from the race and endorse his running mate, calling it a “domestic affair.”
“We will not comment on that,” she said at a regular briefing in Beijing.
Most analysts agreed Harris would, at least initially, bring continuity on trade and foreign policy, meaning little impact for Beijing on the switch-up in the likely Democratic candidate.
“There is a well-established strategic continuity that is driving the US position right now,” said Josef Gregory Mahoney, a professor of international relations at Shanghai’s East China Normal University.
“And at the level of whether it’s Biden or Trump or Harris, it’s really just a matter of style,” Mahoney said.
Fundamentally, the next president has to represent the economic and strategic interests of the US, he added.
Tensions between the world’s largest economies have flared in recent years over China’s military aggression toward Taiwan and Washington’s campaign to cut Beijing off from high-tech chips. While Biden used a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in San Francisco last year to steady ties, fresh US complaints about a surge in cheap Chinese exports are adding friction to the relationship.
Harris has only met Xi on the sidelines of a summit in Thailand and has not visited Beijing in her current role. While Biden is set to be the first US president since Jimmy Carter not to travel to China while in office — a point noted on X by former Global Times editor-in-chief Hu Xijin (胡錫進). Despite that, Biden has repeatedly touted spending “more time” with Xi than any other world leader at “about 90 hours.”
Harris, a former prosecutor, would need to quickly build trust with national security advisers to guide her on China policy, said Drew Thompson, a senior fellow at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy in Singapore.
“Harris does not have a track record on China, and it is not an area she is particularly comfortable,” added the former Pentagon official. “Biden has keen instincts and long-standing relationships with world leaders including Xi Jinping, but Harris does not.”
One asset she could leverage is California Governor Gavin Newsom, whose trip to China last year won praise inside the Asian nation for bringing a more constructive message of cooperation than visits from other Biden administration officials.
While Chinese citizens touted Newsom as a Biden replacement after the US president’s bad debate performance, the Californian has backed Harris for the ticket.
“Tough. Fearless. Tenacious,” he wrote of her on his official X page. “No one is better to prosecute the case against Donald Trump’s dark vision.”
Newsom in a senior Cabinet role could help Harris harness the rapport he has established with Chinese leaders. Both Democrats built their careers in California, the only US state to send a governor to Beijing for a meeting with Xi during Biden’s term and one with strong business ties to the Asian nation.
Harris’ public comments display a willingness to uphold the current administration’s tough stance on trade, which has seen Biden build on tariffs imposed by Trump. Those curbs have been justified as necessary for protecting both national security and US jobs.
Following a summit of Southeast Asian countries in Indonesia last year, Harris said there was a need to protect US interests and ensure “we are a leader in terms of the rules of the road, as opposed to following others’ rules.”
During that event, she slammed Beijing for “bullying,” citing its attempts at controlling access to the South China Sea, where China has sweeping claims of sovereignty.
Harris also visited Palawan, the Philippines, an island close to an area that is in heavy dispute between China and neighboring countries.
Harris’ foreign policy overall is expected to align with Biden’s, especially regarding China, said Zhu Junwei, a former researcher in the People’s Liberation Army who is now director of American research at Grandview Institution.
“The two parties don’t have much difference on China,” she said of Republicans and Democrats. “On China they’re quite the same.”
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS