Former US president Donald Trump’s comments that Taiwan hollowed out the US semiconductor industry are incorrect. That misunderstanding could impact the future of one of the world’s most important relationships and end up aiding China at a time it is working hard to push its own tech sector to catch up.
“Taiwan took our chip business from us,” the returnee US presidential contender told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview published this week.
The remarks came after the Republican nominee was asked whether he would defend Taiwan against China. It is not the first time he has said this about the nation’s chip sector, but comes amid heightened military, trade and technology rivalry between the two superpowers.
In truth, Taiwan accounts for less than a quarter of the global semiconductor market, trailing the US, but has more than a 90 percent share in the fabrication of the most advanced chips.
Right now, the global semiconductor space ought to be celebrating a boom driven by skyrocketing demand for artificial intelligence (AI).
Netherlands-based ASML Holding NV, maker of the world’s most-important semiconductor manufacturing equipment, on Wednesday reported bookings for new machines that surpassed estimates by almost 30 percent. On Thursday, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), which controls more than 90 percent of leading-edge production capacity, lifted its revenue outlook for the year.
Instead of rising in recent days, shares of both companies dropped. In addition to Trump’s comment, investors are worried about the possibility of tighter regulations on China from the current administration of US President Joe Biden.
The White House is considering the imposition of the foreign direct product rule on the chip sector, which would apply to foreign-made products that use even a tiny amount of US technology, Bloomberg News reported. Such a move would extend an existing series of restrictions aimed at limiting China’s technological advance.
Trump’s broader view of the Taiwan-US relationship, though, could be far more damaging in the long run than another round of export curbs. In his defense, the belief that Taipei took from the US is a common misperception, but the former president happens to be the loudest voice and might soon be back in the White House to act on it.
In fact, the seed of Taiwan’s technological rise was planted by US foreign policy dating back to 1950, before semiconductors were invented. Then-US president Harry Truman directed his administration to pump money into the nation’s economy.
The US was also there at the birth of Taiwan’s chip sector. Radio Corporation of America in 1976 agreed to license its semiconductor technology to Taiwan, for a fee. United Microelectronics Corp (UMC) came from this program and was one of the first companies globally to make its factories available to external clients who needed chips made-to-order.
A decade later, Morris Chang (張忠謀), a US citizen and former senior executive at Texas Instruments Inc, founded TSMC. It was the first to only make chips for external clients. Intel Corp was among the earliest customers.
Since then, the Taiwan-US technology relationship has been one of symbiosis and codependence. In the 1990s, when fledgling US chip designers could not find a local factory to make their products, TSMC and UMC were on hand to help. Qualcomm Inc, Nvidia Corp and Xilinx Inc, giants of the US semiconductor industry, would not exist today if not for the Taiwanese.
In the past 20 years, as US firms dropped the ball on technological advancement and capacity expansion, Taiwanese companies have put up the money to research and develop new processes and bet more than US$250 billion on the factories needed to churn out US-designed chips.
At the same time, Chinese companies, the US’ true rivals, have been accused of stealing technology from Taiwanese and US businesses to aid Beijing’s technological development.
If not for the risks taken by Taiwanese enterprises and cooperation — instead of unbridled competition — with US companies, Qualcomm and Broadcom Inc could not have dominated the global market for communications chips. Nvidia, Intel and Advanced Micro Devices Inc would not be ahead of China in the AI chip race.
To view Taiwan-US economic history as anything but mutually beneficial risks fracturing one of the world’s most important industrial relationships, opening the door for China to take advantage of an unnecessary fissure. Instead, the White House, no matter who occupies it, needs to understand that Taipei is not a rival; it is one of the biggest cheerleaders for US technology leadership.
Tim Culpan is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology in Asia. Previously, he was a technology reporter for Bloomberg News.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS