The first session of the 11th Legislative Yuan’s four-year term ended on Tuesday, and 55 bills were passed in the session, which is the fewest bills passed in one session in 12 years.
However, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) said the session delivered a “very good result,” despite there being fights and arguments in this break-in session for many newly elected legislators.
In the last two days of the session, lawmakers rushed to pass a slew of resolutions and bills, mainly proposed by opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators, who have a combined majority in the legislature.
However, some of the resolutions and bills they hurriedly passed were controversial, including a resolution to remove a ban on group travel to China, and another requiring the president to give a state of the nation address at the legislature and answer questions from legislators.
The controversial amendments opposition legislators pushed through the legislature in May to the Act Governing the Legislative Yuan’s Power (立法院職權行使法) and the Criminal Code greatly expanded lawmakers’ investigative power.
The amendments sparked strong objections from Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, leading to physical confrontations and bringing tens of thousands of people onto the streets in protest.
It also prompted three government entities and the DPP to file petitions to the Constitutional Court seeking a judgement on the constitutionality of the amendments.
The Constitutional Court on Friday issued an injunction halting the enforcement of most of the articles in the amendments, including the one which requires the president to respond to lawmakers’ questions after delivering a state of the nation address.
The KMT caucus said the ruling confirmed “the death of judicial independence” and the court justices were “enforcers” of the DPP, and were so “greedy for power and position” that they were willing to abandon their dignity, adding that it was a “major constitutional crisis.”
The public cannot expect the justices to rule impartially on the amendments’ constitutionality, it said.
The KMT also said that, as the largest party in the legislature, it would continue to participate in the constitutional interpretation process to protect the “last hope” for the survival of the Republic of China’s rule of law and democracy.
The TPP caucus members said they were angry about the “unacceptable” injunction, adding that the court’s position was predetermined and it would have to face “the examination of public opinion and the historical judgement of democracy.”
The injunction ruling and the KMT and TPP responses encapsulate the first legislative session, showing the two parties’ pomposity and disrespect for the rule of law.
In the injunction hearing, KMT and TPP representatives said the court should not even have accepted the appeal, and their amendments are to fulfill the principles of popular sovereignty, responsible politics and the rule of law.
However, their actions to expand lawmakers’ investigative powers and override the rights of citizens, government officials and the elected head of state show that they have confused their self-professed principles with “majority rule,” believing that they are the sole representatives of the public and are superior to all others, including the law.
It was arrogant how they drafted the amendments covertly, and some party legislators, who were forced to vote uniformly with the caucuses’ decisions, looked clueless. TPP Legislator Chen Gau-tzu (陳昭姿) last month said she had to suppress the urge to vote against a KMT-proposed bill and follow her caucus.
The two parties’ attitude is the source of the constitutional crisis they claim to be trying to prevent.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS