With the world mired in confusion about how useful the artificial intelligence (AI) boom really is, an odd contribution has come from former British prime minister Tony Blair. Days after the Labour Party he once led returned to power, his Tony Blair Institute for Global Change hosted an AI-focused conference on the future of the UK, where he urged British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s new government to embrace AI as the “biggest technological revolution since the Industrial Revolution.” However, look closely: Blair’s platitudes sound like consultancy speak, and his claims that 40 percent of the UK public-sector work could be done by AI came from a dubious source: ChatGPT.
Blair has essentially gone full throttle into keeping the hype alive for a technology that businesses are grappling with on utility, cost and misinformation. That is unhelpful at a time when tech firms desperately need to get better at managing expectations about AI. It also does a disservice to the UK’s public sector. Why, for instance, would a university graduate want to be an administrator with the National Health Service (NHS) if the former prime minister has just said that 40 percent its tasks could be automated?
Blair’s predictions should be taken with an appropriate measure of doubt. Yes, machine-learning systems could help to optimize government systems, but doing so would take many years to bear fruit — perhaps a decade or so initially — especially when the UK has one of the longest-established civil services in the world.
The 40 percent figure that Blair has touted in interviews is also highly suspect. It comes from a research paper by his institute that looked at 20,000 tasks from a database of job occupations, known as O*NET. That is a US database with US jobs, and mapping them for an organization as unique as the UK’s NHS, which has a byzantine array of trusts and administrative layers, is already a stretch.
Then the researchers do something mindboggling. They ask ChatGPT which of the jobs in that database could be carried out with AI — since asking human experts would be “intractable” for the research. The vast majority of the paper’s estimates are carried out by ChatGPT, a close analysis of its methodology by Bloomberg Opinion’s data-science team showed. The researchers, for instance, ask the AI tool to categorize jobs, decide which type of tool could perform each one and estimate the time saved by automating them. The jobs data in the study use vague descriptions which would make it difficult for even human experts to gauge, and the possibility of errors in the conclusion is high, since ChatGPT has to take several steps to make its estimates. Overall, the dramatic 40 percent figure that Blair has been touting looks unreliable.
The same paper recommends the British government invest in AI technology and “upgrade its data systems,” without naming any providers. One has to wonder whether Blair in an informal meeting with Starmer — who has reportedly been turning to his predecessor for advice — would suggest the services of software giant Oracle Corp.
Oracle became an IT provider to the UK back when Blair was in power (from 1997 to 2007), and it still has contracts with the UK’s health service, The Times said.
The Labour leader went on to become close with Oracle’s billionaire founder Larry Ellison, and Ellison has since become a key donor to Blair’s institute, pledging US$375 million in donations so far, The Times said.
A spokesman for the Tony Blair Institute said: “Mr. Blair is not recommending Oracle to the UK Government and please do not suggest that.”
The spokesman did not directly answer questions about whether the Ellison Foundation was the institute’s biggest donor.
“The Larry Ellison Foundation donation is not the only large donation TBI [Tony Blair Institute] has,” the spokesman said. “We have nothing further to add.”
As someone who lived through the excitement of the Blair years, it is odd to see him gracing television screens once again, even if his public appearances make sense. Starmer has successfully rebuilt and rebranded Labour into an effective alternative to the Conservatives, in much the same way Blair did in 1997. However, Blair has gone on to style himself as a global statesman to rival former US secretary of state Henry Kissinger, for instance advising African governments and hiring the former prime minister of Finland.
With Starmer no doubt looking for clever ways to kick-start the UK’s ailing healthcare system, Blair’s promises of automation might work for furthering his agenda, but his timing is reckless. Market skepticism is growing, as AI has yet to broadly demonstrate its potential. Generative AI holds promise, but tech companies such as OpenAI Inc, Google and Microsoft Corp have shot themselves in the foot by marketing it as an enterprise-ready, all-purpose magic bullet, and Blair’s warped and flawed AI study only reinforces that mirage.
It has been said that when technology firms find their enterprise contracts drying up, the next best place to go is the public sector. It would be a shame if the new British government fell under the spell of Blair and AI without due diligence. Starmer has made transparency central to his mandate, so any moves to embrace Blair’s guidance on AI should come with plenty of details, along with patience and restraint. Promises of a transformation are easy to conjure, but much harder to put into practice.
Parmy Olson is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology. A former reporter for the Wall Street Journal and Forbes, she is author of We Are Anonymous.
With assistance from Carolyn Silverman.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS