Brace yourself if you are a parent, because I am about to tell you something shocking: Families pay nothing for childcare in Berlin. That is right, daycare is free for all kids from age one until they start school at six.
Universal, low-cost early-years education might seem a pipe dream to those spending more on this essential service than on rent, but it need not be.
The independent, nonprofit kita or daycare my daughter attended is open from 8am to 5:30pm, five days a week, meaning her parents could both work full time. A handful of doting staff was responsible for about 25 children; my daughter adored going there and was soon speaking German fluently.
Illustration: Louise Ting
Free supervision continues now at primary school, where breakfast, afterschool and vacation clubs, called hort, are all provided at no cost. Not having to worry about who would look after her or how we would pay is an incredible privilege — one I think your family should enjoy too.
Of course, the Berlin system is not perfect — it can be difficult to find an available spot, and employees at the minority of facilities run by the state recently went on strike for better working conditions, for example.
The city-state also remains an outlier in Germany, where since 2013 all children have been guaranteed a daycare place from age one, but costs and the quality of provision vary widely.
Nevertheless, Berlin’s boldness is helping reframe the way childcare is viewed by society; rather than being a private commodity, it is shared infrastructure every bit as essential as libraries and parks. The idea is catching on: All children in Portugal born since 2021 are to be offered free daycare, for instance.
These policies sound radical, but kids in advanced economies attend primary school for free, so why not before? Relying on a tribe of near-relations to help is no longer realistic for many folks.
Affordable care for parents benefits us all by allowing mothers to stay in the workforce, which is even more important in places affected by shrinking working-age populations, such as Germany. Their kids also develop important social and cognitive skills.
Largely market-driven childcare systems such as those in the US and the UK have been a disaster. Daycare centers charge massive fees, but operate on razor-thin margins. High staffing is required to ensure quality care, but governments do not provide enough financial support.
The good news is politicians on both sides of the Atlantic are finally taking this crisis more seriously. As a dual national, I have been delighted to see England edge closer to the Berlin model, albeit with significant caveats.
From next year, working parents in England are set to receive 30 hours a week of free childcare during term time, from nine months until their children start school. That is welcome news considering a full-time nursery place for under-twos costs an average of nearly ￡15,000 (US$19,379) — and far more in London. (Previously, only working parents of three and four-year-olds were eligible for 30 free hours.)
This is expected to double the childcare entitlements budget to ￡8 billion by 2028, the Institute for Fiscal Studies said, meaning the government would pay for roughly 80 percent of preschool care in England, compared with 50 percent currently (based on existing use patterns).
The policy was one of the most radical of the last Conservative government, yet there remain big questions about whether the funding is sufficient. If it is not, centers would either close or find ways to charge more for non-funded hours and sundry items. This is why some on the left have characterized the Conservatives’ parting gift as a “trap.” However, I think Labour should not only honor the policy, it should push for an even more comprehensive plan.
Regrettably US President Joe Biden was unable to deliver free public preschool for three and four-year-olds, and cap other childcare expenses at 7 percent of household income for all but the wealthiest families. In the meantime, COVID-19-era daycare subsidies have expired.
Happily, states are filling the gap: Kudos to California for following in New York’s footsteps and rolling out universal preschool for four-year-olds.
Of course, governments must not neglect supply-side incentives to ensure the number of workers and facilities match rising demand — England’s ￡1,000 bonus for new recruits might not suffice. Expanding free hours too hastily could backfire by causing quality to suffer: Berlin began gradually reducing fees about a decade before they were abolished in 2018.
Budgetary constraints might necessitate more affluent families paying at least a token amount. In France for example, fees for children up to age two who attend a creche or a nursery are means-tested (subject to a cap, while from age three nursery is mandatory and free).
Sweden caps childcare expenses at just 3 percent of income for the first child (with a hard cap of 1,572 kroner (US$147) a month in 2022) and a progressively lower percentage burden for subsequent children.
However, policymakers should avoid too much complexity: In England, parents earning more than ￡100,000 are not entitled to additional funds, creating a perverse incentive to earn less. Similarly, denying funding to parents who are not working is wrong, because disadvantaged children stand to benefit most from daycare.
This might all sound daunting, but the US provided universal childcare during World War II when women were needed in the labor force to help defeat the Nazis. Eight decades later, the German capital is leading the way.
Chris Bryant is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering industrial companies in Europe. Previously, he was a reporter for the Financial Times.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS