The Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau intends to investigate allegations of Chinese infiltration through a third-party committee, sources said on July 4.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is increasingly using Taiwan’s democracy and freedom against it, recruiting Taiwanese for espionage and interfering in Taiwan’s elections through influence campaigns, bureau Director-General Chen Pai-li (陳白立) said.
Suspects in such trials are regularly acquitted due to lack of evidence and difficulty tracing funds back to the CCP.
Then on Tuesday last week, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators passed a bill that removed restrictions on group tours to China and prioritizes Chinese tourists and tour groups wanting to visit Kinmen, Penghu and Lienchiang (Matsu) counties.
It would be difficult for customs and immigration authorities to know whether Chinese visitors have ties to the CCP, and investigators would be hard-pressed to track the movements of all Chinese visitors for obvious logistical and legal reasons.
A CCP member visited the Institute for National Defense and Security Research — a Ministry of National Defense think tank — last year as part of a delegation, said the Liberty Times, sister paper of the Taipei Times.
Prioritizing Chinese tourism to Taiwan’s outlying islands could compromise the integrity of those islands, which are important to Taiwan’s defense strategy. That importance is evident in the stationing of US Army Special Forces personnel in Kinmen and Penghu, which was confirmed by Minister of National Defense Chiu Kuo-cheng (邱國正) on March 14.
Despite prevailing concerns about espionage, KMT legislators Chen Hsueh-sheng (陳雪生) and Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) on July 4 proposed amendments to the Offshore Islands Development Act (離島建設條例) that would allow Chinese firms to tender for industrial development and public construction projects in outlying counties.
The amendments would have given unfettered access in the counties to Chinese employees of firms who win public tenders. Fortunately, the bill was halted when TPP caucus whip Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) said that his party would not support it.
The committee, which the Investigation Bureau established jointly with the National Security Bureau, the Mainland Affairs Council and the Military Intelligence Bureau, must be aggressive in tackling espionage cases to prevent the CCP from making inroads. Taiwanese collaborators must not be acquitted nor shown leniency, as this would only encourage others to work for the CCP, knowing they could do so with impunity.
Senior prosecutors said the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) does not need to be revised to pursue spying cases, but prosecutors need clearer targets. This might be true, but judicial authorities and investigators should also seek to understand why judges are so reluctant to prosecute those facing allegations of spying for the CCP.
The failure of Taiwan’s laws and the Constitution to identify China as a foreign power contributes to the difficulty in trying espionage cases involving the CCP. That suggests that laws might indeed need to be amended. However, if the problem lies in a lack of evidence, then the responsibility would fall on investigators. Hopefully, that is something the new committee can help rectify.
Regardless of how it is achieved, prosecutors and investigators must seek to punish those who compromise Taiwan’s sovereignty and national security by acting on behalf of the CCP. The US, Japan and other countries might be willing to assist Taiwan in the event of a conflict, but Taiwan must also demonstrate the resolve to protect itself.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
RSS