The 11th Legislative Yuan on Wednesday ended its first session, passing new laws against fraud, including amendments to provisions of the Money Laundering Control Act (洗錢防制法). The new laws were passed quickly after three readings and without much debate.
The Executive Yuan had passed the draft laws in May and sent them to the Legislative Yuan for review. The Legislative Yuan passed the bills after three readings in just two months, demonstrating a high level of consensus on the issue and marking a new milestone for regulations against fraud in Taiwan.
However, this also highlights how dissatisfied Taiwanese are with widespread fraud activities. How will the new laws be implemented? How can fraud activities be effectively managed and eliminated in this era of transnational social platforms?
It is up to ministries to formulate sub-laws and develop supporting measures. The Cabinet expects the laws to be implemented without difficulty, but surprisingly, not until next year.
After a law is enacted or revised, administrative agencies and businesses need to go through an adjustment period, allowing the government and the public to adapt to changes in the legal system and facilitating compliance with the law. And yet, fraud-related issues have plagued the public for a long time.
Fraudulent advertisements have run rampant on digital platforms with little regulation for more than 10 years. After passing the new laws, the government should combine its power and resources to quickly establish supporting legal systems, eliminating fraud activities at the source to build a more reliable digital environment.
Taiwanese cannot wait until next year.
Lo Cheng-chung is a professor and director of Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology’s Institute of Financial and Economic Law.
Translated by Nicole Wong
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS