After decades of standing sentry over the enormous bronze statue of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) at his eponymous memorial in Taipei, the honor guards’ clacking boots are no longer heard reverberating around its cavernous hall.
However, they have not gone far: Since Monday, the guards have moved just outside the memorial park’s Democracy Boulevard. When weather permits, a six-member guard is to march from the north and south entrances to the park and converge by the steps leading up to the hall every hour on the hour between 9am and 5pm. They will also still perform the flag-raising and lowering ceremonies as usual, ensuring the popular tourist draw remains mostly unchanged.
The move was decided following negotiations between the Ministry of Culture and the Ministry of National Defense, and announced following a meeting on transitional justice progress moderated by the Executive Yuan earlier this month. The meeting was to precede another to be held later this year, meaning we might see some more developments in transitional justice in the coming months.
The Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall is the symbolic heart of the thorny issue of what to do with symbols of authoritarianism. Ever since Taiwan started down the path of democratization, debates about the hundreds of statues of the former president and dictator abound.
The question is familiar to any country with a complicated past — making it a universal question, because which country has a spotless record? The options often boil down to either removing a statue or leaving it unchanged, but rarely is that a satisfying solution. Especially when handling symbols of an authoritarian past, democracies need to carefully consider public opinion and cannot be perceived as trading one form of autocracy for another.
Considering this, it is no wonder that the memorial hall has remained virtually unchanged in the intervening decades. Conflicting calls to tear down the statue or leave it as a reminder of the nation’s past — for good and for bad — are equally valid. Many proposals have been raised over the years, ranging from transforming it into a human rights memorial or a monument to all the nation’s leaders, to some more creative proposals like moving the legislature to the site. In 2022, the Transitional Justice Commission even held an exhibition featuring proposed designs to inspire the collective imagination about how to repurpose the hall and surrounding park.
While it is important to keep focusing on the hall and the 760 statues of Chiang that remain standing nationwide, it also threatens to overshadow the significant progress that has already been made toward transitional justice. For one, relocating hundreds of the Chiang statues to the Chiang Kai-shek Cihu Statue Park is a creative solution that preserves the symbols while simultaneously creating a new attraction where Taiwanese and visitors alike can learn about the nation’s history.
While the memorial might not have changed much aesthetically, it is functionally radically different than when it opened in 1980. Liberty Square at the other end of the park is where the nation’s most important protest movements have been held, and the exhibition hall inside now highlights Taiwan’s unique arts and culture.
Perhaps most importantly, the continued discussion over how to transform the hall is itself a tool of transitional justice. It is an exercise in the very democratic process that generations of activists have fought for, and a reminder of how far Taiwan has come from its authoritarian past.
Although small, this latest change in the location and function of the honor guard is the product of democratic consensus-building and an instructive lesson in incremental progress.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS